Further evidence of BVSR in the areas of aesthetic judgment and personality. Comment on 'Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity' by Prof. Simonton

Kaufman J.C.

首页> 外文期刊>Physics of life reviews >Further evidence of BVSR in the areas of aesthetic judgment and personality. Comment on 'Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity' by Prof. Simonton

【24h】

Further evidence of BVSR in the areas of aesthetic judgment and personality. Comment on 'Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity' by Prof. Simonton

机译：BVSR在美学判断和个性方面的进一步证据。西蒙顿教授对“盲目变化和选择性保留的创造性思维：卓越创造力的组合模型”的评论

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

来源
《Physics of life reviews》 |2010年第2期|共2页
作者
Kaufman J.C.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类物理学;
关键词
入库时间 2022-08-18 16:17:53

相似文献

外文文献

1. Further evidence of BVSR in the areas of aesthetic judgment and personality. Comment on "Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity" by Prof. Simonton [J] . Kaufman J.C. Physics of life reviews . 2010,第2期

机译：BVSR在美学判断和个性方面的进一步证据。西蒙顿教授对“盲目变化和选择性保留的创造性思维：卓越创造力的组合模型”的评论
2. Creative thinking may be simultaneous as well as blind. Comment on "Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity" by Dean Keith Simonton [J] . Runco M.A. Physics of life reviews . 2010,第2期

机译：创造性思维可能是同时发生的，也可能是盲目的。院长基思·西蒙顿（Dean Keith Simonton）对“盲目变异和选择性保留的创造性思维：卓越创造力的组合模型”的评论
3. On the blind-mindedness of creative thought. Comment on "Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity" by Dean Keith Simonton [J] . Dasgupta S. Physics of life reviews . 2010,第2期

机译：论创造性思维的盲目性。院长基思·西蒙顿（Dean Keith Simonton）对“盲目变异和选择性保留的创造性思维：卓越创造力的组合模型”的评论
4. We develop a model of scientific creativity and test it in the field of rare diseases. Our model is based on the results of an in-depth case study of the Rett syndrome. Archival analysis, bibliometric techniques and expert surveys are combined with network analysis to identify the most creative scientists. First, alternative measures of generative and combinatorial creativity are compared. Then, we generalize our results and present a stochastic model of socio-semantic network evolution. The model predictions are tested with multiple networks of rare disease specialties. We find that new scientific collaborations among experts in a field enhance combinatorial creativity. Instead, high entry rates of novices are negatively related to generative creativity. By extending the set of useful concepts, creative scientists gain in centrality. At the same time, by increasing their centrality in the scientific community, scientists can replicate and generalize their results, thus contributing to a scientific paradigm. [O] . Massimo Riccaboni, Maria Laura Frigotto 100

机译：我们开发了一种科学创造力模型，并在稀有疾病领域进行测试。我们的模型基于对Rett综合征的深入案例研究的结果。档案分析，文献计量技术和专家调查与网络分析相结合，以确定最具创造力的科学家。首先，比较生成和组合创造力的替代措施。然后，我们推广了我们的结果，并提出了社会语义网络演化的随机模型。模型预测用多个罕见疾病专业网络进行测试。我们发现，一个领域的专家之间的新的科学合作增强了组合创造力。相反，新手的高入门率与生成创造力负相关。通过扩展这组有用的概念，创造性的科学家获得了中心地位。同时，通过增加科学界的中心地位，科学家们可以复制和推广他们的结果，从而促进科学范式的发展。

Further evidence of BVSR in the areas of aesthetic judgment and personality. Comment on 'Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity' by Prof. Simonton

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅