首页> 外文期刊>Phytotaxa >Taxonomic status of Clematis acerifolia var. elobata, based on molecular evidence
【24h】

Taxonomic status of Clematis acerifolia var. elobata, based on molecular evidence

机译:铁线莲属铁线莲变种的分类学地位。基于分子证据的叶形

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The morphologically based taxonomic status of Clematis acerifolia var. elobata has been controversial. This study used two nuclear (ITS and ETS) and six plastid (rps16, rpl16, accD, trnS-trnG, atpB-rbcL, and trnV-atpE) molecular markers, and a DNA barcoding analysis to address the taxonomic status of C. acerifolia var. elobata and the relationship among other Clematis species. Our results showed that the discrimination power of ITS, ETS, and atpB-rbcL was better than that of the other tested DNA regions. When all tested sequences combined, most of the sampled taxa were resolved. Though the two taxa are closely related, they have differentiated clearly and formed two clades respectively. The mean divergence of the two taxa was 0.78%, which was higher than closely related Clematis species such as C. heracleifolia and C. pinnata (0.50 %). Considering molecular divergence, morphological differences, and distribution area, we raised C. acerifolia var. elobata to species level.
机译:铁线莲属铁线莲变种的基于形态学的分类学地位。 elobata一直存在争议。这项研究使用了两个核(ITS和ETS)和六个质体(rps16,rpl16,accD,trnS-trnG,atpB-rbcL和trnV-atpE)分子标记,并进行了DNA条形码分析,以解决形衣原体的分类学状况。变种莲和其他铁线莲属物种之间的关系。我们的结果表明,ITS,ETS和atpB-rbcL的识别能力优于其他测试的DNA区域。当所有测试序列组合在一起时,大多数采样分类单元都被解析了。尽管这两个分类单元密切相关,但它们已经清楚地区分并分别形成了两个分支。两个分类单元的平均差异为0.78%,高于紧密相关的铁线莲属物种,例如C. heracleifolia和C. pinnata(0.50%)。考虑到分子差异,形态差异和分布区域,我们提出了C. acerifolia var。到物种水平的叶形。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号