首页> 外文期刊>Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety >Validity of smoking prevalence estimates from primary care electronic health records compared with national population survey data for England, 2007 to 2011
【24h】

Validity of smoking prevalence estimates from primary care electronic health records compared with national population survey data for England, 2007 to 2011

机译:根据2007年至2011年英格兰的初级保健电子健康记录与全国人口调查数据相比,吸烟率估计的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: Primary care electronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used as a resource for epidemiological research. Cigarette smoking is an important variable in many epidemiological studies. We evaluated the validity of smoking records in primary care EHRs by comparing estimates for smoking prevalence from primary care EHRs with national health survey data. Methods: Data were analysed for adults over 30years of age from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) in comparison with data from the Health Survey for England between 2007 and 2011. Electronic health records in the CPRD were searched for records of smoking status and smoking cessation treatment. Annual age- and sex-standardised prevalence of current-, non- and former smoking were calculated, and compared with equivalent data from the Health Survey for England (HSE). Results: The difference between estimates of current smoking in CPRD and HSE was generally <1% from 2007 to 2011. In 2011, the prevalence of current smoking in men was: CPRD 24.3%, HSE 24.2%. The mean difference was 0.1% (95% confidence interval -1.5 to 1.7%). In women, current smoking prevalence was CPRD 20.3%, HSE 19.0%; mean difference 1.3% (0.0 to 2.6%). Estimates for former smoking were lower in CPRD than HSE for men (CPRD 26.7%, HSE 31.3%) and women (CPRD 22.9%, HSE 25.0%). Conclusions: Prevalence estimates for current smoking, and non-smoking, from primary care EHRs are similar to those from nationally representative surveys, but former smoking may be under-recorded.
机译:目的:基层医疗电子健康记录(EHR)被越来越多地用作流行病学研究的资源。在许多流行病学研究中,吸烟是一个重要的变量。我们通过将来自初级保健EHR的吸烟率估算值与国家健康调查数据进行比较,评估了初级保健EHR中吸烟记录的有效性。方法:将临床实践研究数据链接(CPRD)中30岁以上成年人的数据与2007年至2011年英国健康调查的数据进行比较。在CPRD中搜索电子健康记录,以了解吸烟状况和吸烟情况戒烟治疗。计算当前,非和以前吸烟的年度年龄和性别标准化患病率,并将其与英格兰健康调查(HSE)的等效数据进行比较。结果:从2007年到2011年,CPRD和HSE当前吸烟估计值之间的差异通常<1%。2011年,男性当前吸烟率分别为:CPRD 24.3%,HSE 24.2%。平均差异为0.1%(95%置信区间-1.5至1.7%)。在女性中,目前的吸烟率是CPRD 20.3%,HSE 19.0%;平均差异1.3%(0.0至2.6%)。男性(CPRD为26.7%,HSE 31.3%)和女性(CPRD为22.9%,HSE 25.0%)的CPRD中以前吸烟的估计值低于HSE。结论:初级保健电子病历对当前吸烟和不吸烟的流行率估计与全国代表性调查相似,但以前吸烟的记录可能不足。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号