首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is superior to lamivudine plus adefovir in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients
【24h】

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is superior to lamivudine plus adefovir in lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients

机译:在耐拉米夫定的慢性乙肝患者中,替诺福韦酯富马酸泰索非尔优于拉米夫定加阿德福韦

获取原文
       

摘要

AIM: To assess the efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in lamivudine (LAM)-resistant patients with a suboptimal response to LAM plus adefovir (ADV). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in suboptimal responders to lamivudine plus adefovir. Charts were reviewed for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who visited the Zhejiang Province People’s Hospital and The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, from June 2009 to May 2013. Patients whose serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA remained detectable despite at least 6 mo of LAM plus ADV combination therapy were included. Patients with a suboptimal response to LAM plus ADV were randomized to switch to TDF monotherapy (300 mg/d orally; TDF group) or to continuation with LAM (100 mg/d orally) plus ADV (10 mg/d orally; LAM plus ADV group) and were followed for 48 wk. Serum HBV DNA was determined at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. HBV serological markers and biochemistry were assessed at baseline and weeks 12, 24, and 48. Resistance surveillance and side effects were monitored during therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patient were randomized to switch to TDF (n = 28) or continuation with LAM plus ADV (n = 31). No significant differences were found between the groups at baseline. Prior to TDF therapy, all patients had been exposed to LAM plus ADV for a median of 11 mo (range: 6-24 mo). No difference was seen in baseline serum HBV DNA between the two groups [5.13 ± 1.08 log10 copies/mL (TDF) vs 5.04 ± 31.16 log10 copies/mL (LAM + ADV), P = 0.639]. There was no significant difference in the rates of achieving complete virological response (CVR) at week 4 between the TDF and LAM + ADV groups (17.86% vs 6.45%, P = 0.24). The rate of achieving CVR in the TDF and LAM plus ADV groups was 75% vs 16.13% at week 12, 82.14% vs 22.58% at week 24, 89.29% vs 25.81% at week 36, and 96.43% vs 29.03% at week 48, respectively (P vs 17.86%, P vs 54.84%, P = 0.097) or 48 (89.26% vs 67.74%, P = 0.062). Patients were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive at baseline. There was no significant difference in HBeAg negativity between the TDF and LAM plus ADV groups at week 48 (4% vs 0%, P = 0.481). There were no drug-related adverse effects at week 48 in either group. CONCLUSION: Switching to TDF monotherapy was superior to continuous add-on therapy in patients with LAM-resistant CHB with a suboptimal response to LAM plus ADV.
机译:目的:评估替诺福韦富马酸替诺福韦(TDF)在对拉米夫定(LAM)耐药且对LAM加阿德福韦(ADV)反应不佳的患者中的疗效。方法:我们回顾性分析了拉米夫定加阿德福韦对次佳反应者改用替诺福韦富马酸替索罗非的疗效。回顾了2009年6月至2013年5月访问浙江省人民医院和浙江大学医学院附属第一医院的LAM耐药性慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者的图表。血清B型肝炎病毒(HBV)的患者尽管包括了至少6 mo的LAM加ADV联合治疗,但仍可检测到DNA。对LAM加ADV反应不佳的患者被随机分为TDF单药治疗(300 mg / d口服; TDF组)或继续接受LAM(100 mg / d口服)加ADV(10 mg / d口服; LAM加ADV)组),并随访48周。在基线和第4、12、24、36和48周时测定血清HBV DNA。在基线和第12、24和48周时评估HBV血清学标志物和生化指标。在治疗期间监测耐药性监测和副作用。结果:59例患者被随机分为TDF组(n = 28)或继续接受LAM加ADV(n = 31)。基线时各组之间未发现显着差异。在TDF治疗之前,所有患者均接受了LAM加ADV的中位数11个月(范围:6-24个月)。两组之间的基线血清HBV DNA无差异[5.13±1.08 log 10 拷贝/ mL(TDF)与5.04±31.16 log 10 拷贝/ mL(LAM) + ADV),P = 0.639]。 TDF组和LAM + ADV组之间在第4周获得完全病毒学应答(CVR)的速率没有显着差异(17.86%对6.45%,P = 0.24)。 TDF,LAM和ADV组在第12周的CVR达到率分别为75%和16.13%,第24周为82.14%对22.58%,第36周为89.29%对25.81%,第48周为96.43%对29.03% ,分别为(P vs. 17.86%,P vs 54.84%,P = 0.097)或48(89.26%vs 67.74%,P = 0.062)。患者基线时为乙型肝炎e抗原(HBeAg)阳性。在第48周,TDF组和LAM加ADV组之间的HBeAg阴性没有显着差异(4%比0%,P = 0.481)。两组均在第48周没有药物相关的不良反应。结论:对于LAM耐药的CHB患者,对LAM加ADV的反应欠佳,转用TDF单一疗法优于连续追加疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号