首页> 外文期刊>Frontiers in Psychology >Commentary: Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking
【24h】

Commentary: Aesthetic Pleasure versus Aesthetic Interest: The Two Routes to Aesthetic Liking

机译:评论:审美乐趣与审美兴趣:审美喜好的两种途径

获取原文
       

摘要

In this commentary, I draw attention to two limitations of Graf and Landwehr (2017). The article addresses one of the main questions investigated by current research on aesthetic preferences in art and product design literature: the relationship between pleasure and interest with respect to aesthetic liking (Muth and Carbon, 2016). In line with recent research (Consoli, 2016), the article stresses the multidimensional nature of aesthetic liking. In particular, according to the core premise of the Pleasure-Interest Model (Graf and Landwehr, 2015), the basic thesis is that aesthetic liking has a dual character: it can be triggered by two distinct and separate processing components, precisely a pleasure-based response and an interest-based response. In line with this thesis two studies are proposed in order to investigate if the pleasure component of aesthetic liking is triggered by a gut-level fluency experience during automatic processing, while the interest component is driven by an experience of disfluency reduction in virtue of controlled processing.
机译:在这篇评论中,我提请注意Graf和Landwehr(2017)的两个局限性。本文解决了当前在艺术和产品设计文学中对审美偏好的研究所调查的主要问题之一:愉悦与兴趣之间在审美喜好方面的关系(Muth和Carbon,2016年)。与最近的研究(Consoli,2016)一致,本文强调了审美喜好的多维本质。特别是,根据“兴趣模型”的核心前提(Graf和Landwehr,2015年),基本论点是,审美喜好具有双重特征:它可以由两个截然不同的处理组件触发,恰好是基于响应和基于兴趣的响应。根据本论文,提出了两项​​研究,以研究审美喜好的乐趣部分是否由自动处理过程中的肠道水平流利度体验触发,而兴趣部分是由受控处理过程中的减少流淌度体验驱动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号