首页> 外文期刊>BMC Public Health >The comprehensive ‘Communicate to Vaccinate’ taxonomy of communication interventions for childhood vaccination in routine and campaign contexts
【24h】

The comprehensive ‘Communicate to Vaccinate’ taxonomy of communication interventions for childhood vaccination in routine and campaign contexts

机译:在日常和竞选活动中,针对儿童接种的交流干预措施的综合性“ Communicate to Vaccinate”分类法

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Communication can be used to generate demand for vaccination or address vaccine hesitancy, and is crucial to successful childhood vaccination programmes. Research efforts have primarily focused on communication for routine vaccination. However, vaccination campaigns, particularly in low- or middle-income countries (LMICs), also use communication in diverse ways. Without a comprehensive framework integrating communication interventions from routine and campaign contexts, it is not possible to conceptualise the full range of possible vaccination communication interventions. Therefore, vaccine programme managers may be unaware of potential communication options and researchers may not focus on building evidence for interventions used in practice. In this paper, we broaden the scope of our existing taxonomy of communication interventions for routine vaccination to include communication used in campaigns, and integrate these into a comprehensive taxonomy of vaccination communication interventions. Methods Building on our taxonomy of communication for routine vaccination, we identified communication interventions used in vaccination campaigns through a targeted literature search; observation of vaccination activities in Cameroon, Mozambique and Nigeria; and stakeholder consultations. We added these interventions to descriptions of routine vaccination communication and categorised the interventions according to their intended purposes, building from an earlier taxonomy of communication related to routine vaccination. Results The comprehensive taxonomy groups communication used in campaigns and routine childhood vaccination into seven purpose categories: ‘Inform or Educate’; ‘Remind or Recall’; ‘Enhance Community Ownership’; ‘Teach Skills’; ‘Provide Support’; ‘Facilitate Decision Making’ and ‘Enable Communication’. Consultations with LMIC stakeholders and experts informed the taxonomy’s definitions and structure and established its potential uses. Conclusions This taxonomy provides a standardised way to think and speak about vaccination communication. It is categorised by purpose to help conceptualise communication interventions as potential solutions to address needs or problems. It can be utilised by programme planners, implementers, researchers and funders to see the range of communication interventions used in practice, facilitate evidence synthesis and identify evidence gaps.
机译:背景技术交流可用于产生对疫苗的需求或解决疫苗的犹豫,这对于成功的儿童疫苗接种计划至关重要。研究工作主要集中在常规疫苗的交流上。但是,疫苗接种运动,特别是在中低收入国家(LMIC)中,也以多种方式利用交流。如果没有一个综合框架,将常规和竞选活动中的交流干预措施整合在一起,就不可能概念化所有可能的疫苗接种交流干预措施。因此,疫苗项目管理人员可能不知道潜在的交流选择,研究人员可能不会专注于为实践中使用的干预措施收集证据。在本文中,我们扩大了常规疫苗接种通信干预措施的现有分类法的范围,以包括运动中使用的通信方法,并将其整合到疫苗接种通信干预措施的综合分类法中。方法基于常规疫苗接种的交流分类法,我们通过有针对性的文献检索确定了疫苗接种运动中使用的交流干预措施;观察喀麦隆,莫桑比克和尼日利亚的疫苗接种活动;和利益相关者的咨询。我们将这些干预措施添加到常规疫苗接种通信的描述中,并根据其预期目的对干预措施进行了分类,并从与常规疫苗接种相关的早期通信分类法中构建了这些干预措施。结果综合分类法将运动和儿童常规预防接种中使用的沟通分为七个目的类别:“告知或教育”; “提醒或回想”; “增强社区所有权”; “教学技巧”; '提供支持'; “方便决策”和“启用交流”。与LMIC利益相关者和专家进行的磋商为分类法的定义和结构提供了依据,并确定了其潜在用途。结论该分类法提供了一种思考和谈论疫苗接种交流的标准化方法。它按目的进行分类,以帮助将通信干预概念化为解决需求或问题的潜在解决方案。计划计划者,实施者,研究人员和资助者可以利用它来查看实践中使用的各种交流干预措施,促进证据综合并找出证据差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号