首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Scientific Research and Reports >Does the Method of Instruction Matter in MiddleBasic Pupilsa€? Science Process Skill Acquisition?An Examination of Field-Based Inquiry andConventional Strategies
【24h】

Does the Method of Instruction Matter in MiddleBasic Pupilsa€? Science Process Skill Acquisition?An Examination of Field-Based Inquiry andConventional Strategies

机译:中小学生的教学方法很重要吗?科学过程技能习得?基于实地的探究和常规策略的检验

获取原文
       

摘要

Aims: This study investigated the extent to which the field-based, inquiry method of instruction (FBIMI) will be effective in impacting middle basic (5th grader) pupils’ science process skill acquisition as compared to the conventional strategy. Study Design: The study adopted a quasi-experimental design particularly a non-equivalent control group type.Place and Duration of Study: The study was in Makurdi, Benue State Nigeria. The duration for the study was January to March in 2012.Methodology: The sample for the study consisted of three hundred and twenty-nine pupils from six schools selected by random sampling. Acquisition of Science Process Skills Test (ASPST) was the instrument used in this study. The reliability estimate for ASPST was found to be 0.95.Results: It was found that teaching method, FBIMI is an important factor in science process skill acquisition of learners and the students exposed to FBIMI acquired process skill significantly higher than those exposed to conventional strategy. The experimental group showed a higher aptitude than the control group. Gender was found to have no significant effect in the acquisition of science process skills in the experimental group. Conclusion and Recommendation: FBIMI is found to be suitable for instruction of pupils of primary school age, therefore; Basic Science and Technology Curriculum by Nigeria Education Research and Development Centre (NERDC) should include the use of outdoor, field-based experiences among its teaching and learning materials. Also, school supervisors should ensure that teachers use FBIMI as teaching strategy for basic science and technology.
机译:目的:本研究调查了与传统策略相比,基于现场的询问教学法(FBIMI)在多大程度上有效地影响了初中(5年级)学生的科学过程技能的学习。研究设计:研究采用了准实验设计,尤其是非等效对照组。研究的地点和时间:该研究在尼日利亚贝努尔州马库尔迪进行。研究持续时间为2012年1月至3月。方法:研究样本包括来自六所学校的329名通过随机抽样选择的学生。科学过程技能测验(ASPST)的获得是本研究中使用的工具。结果表明:FBIMI的教学方法是学习者科学过程技能获得的重要因素,接触FBIMI的学生所获得的过程技能明显高于传统策略下的学生,其ASPST的可靠性估计为0.95。实验组的智商比对照组高。在实验组中,发现性别对科学过程技能的获取没有显着影响。结论和建议:因此,FBIMI被认为适合指导小学年龄的学生;尼日利亚教育研究与发展中心(NERDC)的基础科学与技术课程应在其教学材料中包括对户外实地体验的利用。此外,学校主管应确保教师将FBIMI用作基础科学技术的教学策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号