首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sustainable Development >Global Utopias of H. G. Wells and Kang Youwei: Comparative Confrontation
【24h】

Global Utopias of H. G. Wells and Kang Youwei: Comparative Confrontation

机译:威尔斯和康有为的全球乌托邦:比较对抗

获取原文
       

摘要

The existing studies conducted in the field of social ideals are characterised by the Eurocentric approach. The aim of the given paper is to analyse two varieties of social ideal created in China and Great Britain at the beginning of the XXth century, which share a number of common peculiarities. The first one was offered by a British socialist, a member of the Fabian society – Herbert George Wells (1866 – 1946), the second was created by a famous Chinese thinker, a reformer and a representative of modern Neo-Confucianism – Kang Youwei (1858 – 1927). The research is based on the comparative method with the application of the functional analysis. It allowed us to compare the social ideals created within two genetically non-related cultures. The article shows that both Wells and Kang Youwei were concerned with global world reorganization, however they come to different results. Wells offered the model of an elite and authoritative Utopia, whose citizens are exposed to selection and segregation according to the strict moral code based on Confucianism. Regulations and standards are carried out by a special organization, the Samurai Order, which is very similar to the “guards” of the Plato Republic or phylarhces in Thomas More’s Utopia. Kang Youwei offered the model of absolute freedom and open society free from any social, intellectual, ethnic and gender barriers. Moreover, he considered hedonism as the key feature of the human nature. The article submissions may be useful for researchers dealing with social utopias, comparative philosophy and history of social thought of the XXth century.
机译:在欧洲理想领域进行的现有研究以欧洲中心论为特征。本文的目的是分析二十世纪初在中国和英国创造的两种社会理想变体,它们具有许多共同的特点。第一个由英国社会主义者,费边社会成员赫伯特·乔治·威尔斯(Herbert George Wells(1866 – 1946))提供,第二个由著名的中国思想家,改革家和现代新儒家的代表康有为提出。 1858年-1927年)。该研究是基于比较方法并结合功能分析的。它使我们能够比较在两种与遗传无关的文化中创造的社会理想。文章显示,威尔斯和康有为都关心全球世界的重组,但是他们得出了不同的结果。威尔斯提供了一个精英,权威的乌托邦模式,根据严格的儒家道德准则,公民可以选择和隔离。规章和标准由专门的组织《武士令》执行,这与柏拉图共和国的“守卫者”或托马斯·莫尔的乌托邦的门徒非常相似。康有为提供了绝对自由和开放社会的模式,没有任何社会,知识,种族和性别障碍。此外,他认为享乐主义是人性的关键特征。该文章的提交可能对研究社会乌托邦,比较哲学和20世纪社会思想史的研究人员有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号