首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Philosophy >Relevance of Feyerabend’s Scientific Anarchism to Scientific Advancement in Nigeria
【24h】

Relevance of Feyerabend’s Scientific Anarchism to Scientific Advancement in Nigeria

机译:费耶阿本德的科学无政府主义与尼日利亚科学进步的相关性

获取原文
       

摘要

Against the western philosophy of globalization’s belief in only one system or a “rational” standard of justification, Paul Feyerabend defends methodological anarchism, which holds that there are alternative systems within which coherence can still be established. Feyerabend, in his objection and rejection of universal standard on method, holds that there are many systems and (even within science itself), each with its own standards of justification and as such, it is not possible to choose between them “rationally”, for they are incommensurable. So, in the place of the “rationality” of universal scientific and technological method, he talks of methodological plurality, or what he terms “Epistemological (Scientific) Anarchism”. On this ground, development, whether scientifically or technologically, must not be considered by some universal criteria, but should be sought on the bases of cultural heritage and geographical differences of each society. Thus, this essay is a clarion call on Nigeria (and Africa at large) to channel her scientific and technological developmental efforts to suit her socio-political demands as well as the particular cultural needs of her people.
机译:保罗·费耶拉本德(Paul Feyerabend)反对西方的全球化哲学只相信一种制度或“理性的”辩护标准,但他捍卫了方法论无政府主义,认为方法论无政府主义仍然可以在其中建立连贯性。费耶阿本德(Feyerabend)反对并拒绝方法的普遍标准,他认为,有很多系统,甚至在科学本身内部,都有各自的辩护标准,因此,不可能“理性地”在它们之间进行选择,因为它们无与伦比。因此,代替了普遍科学技术方法的“合理性”,他谈到了方法论上的多元化,或者他所说的“认识论(科学)无政府主义”。在此基础上,无论是科学还是技术发展,都不能以某种普遍的标准加以考虑,而应基于文化遗产和每个社会的地域差异来寻求。因此,本文是对尼日利亚(以及整个非洲)为适应其社会政治需要以及人民的特殊文化需要而进行科学和技术发展努力的号召。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号