首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Philosophy >Deflationism, Rationalism, and Anti-Rationalism: Three Views of Superego Morality
【24h】

Deflationism, Rationalism, and Anti-Rationalism: Three Views of Superego Morality

机译:通缩主义,理性主义和反理性主义:超我道德的三种观点

获取原文
       

摘要

Philosophers of psychoanalysis have for years been debating over Freud’s criticism of morality as a sheer product of irrationality originated in our superego development. In this paper I shall consider three views on Freud’s moral psychology, which I call the “deflationist”, the “rationalist”, and the “anti-rationalist” view. I argue that both the deflationist and the rationalist view are untenable, as they fail to distinguish among different senses of irrationality that we can attribute to morality. By contrast, I shall develop and defend an anti-rationalist view, to the effect that an inherently irrational superego is no threat to morality’s place in human life, as long as it’s capable of making us experience an integrated form of life. And as this desired interaction does not always come easily, we can naturally see the point of introducing psychoanalysis to our lives.
机译:精神分析的哲学家们多年来一直在争论弗洛伊德对道德的批评,因为道德批评是源于我们超我发展的非理性纯粹产物。在本文中,我将考虑关于弗洛伊德的道德心理学的三种观点,分别称为“通缩主义者”,“理性主义者”和“反理性主义者”。我认为通缩主义者和理性主义者的观点都是站不住脚的,因为它们不能区分我们可以归因于道德的不同非理性感。相比之下,我将发展和捍卫一种反理性主义的观点,即一种本质上非理性的超我不威胁道德在人类生活中的地位,只要它能够使我们体验一种整合的生活形式。由于这种期望的互动并非总是容易实现的,因此我们自然可以将精神分析引入我们的生活中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号