【24h】

Advancing the Debate about Heidegger’s Phenomenology of Death as a Possibility

机译:推进有关海德格尔的死亡现象学作为一种可能性的辩论

获取原文

摘要

Heidegger’s understanding of death in terms of possibility has been debated for more than three decades. The main dispute is about the coherence of the concept of possibility. To advance the debate, we analyse the meaning of “death as a possibility” in three steps. Firstly, we delineate the notions of death and possibility in Heidegger’s fundamental ontology. Secondly, we analyse and evaluate the main opposed interpretations of death as a possibility. Thirdly, we discuss Heidegger’s assertion that death is a distinctive [ausgezeignete] possibility of Dasein. On the basis of the results, we claim that Heidegger provides an ontic-ontological and multilayered framework for the understanding of death. We further argue that one of those layers relates to death as a transcendent possibility for Dasein, which can be further characterised in terms of non-genuine, genuine and—what we call—deconstructive [Abbauende] authenticity. Finally, we suggest that deconstructive authenticity refers to Dasein’s authentic relationship to its own ontological annihilation. As this annihilation cannot be phenomenologically depicted, deconstructive authenticity implies that Dasein is, to a certain extent, free to depict the meaning of its death.
机译:海德格尔对死亡的可能性理解已经争论了三十多年。主要争议在于可能性概念的一致性。为了推进辩论,我们分三步分析了“死亡可能性”的含义。首先,我们在海德格尔的基本本体论中描述了死亡和可能性的概念。其次,我们分析和评估了主要的对死亡解释的可能性。第三,我们讨论海德格尔的断言:死亡是该在的一种独特的[ausgezeignete]可能性。根据结果​​,我们认为海德格尔为了解死亡提供了本体论-本体论和多层框架。我们进一步认为,这些层次之一与死亡有关,是本素的超然可能性,可以用非正版,真实和(我们称为)破坏性的[Abbauende]真实性来进一步表征。最后,我们建议解构的真实性是指Dasein与自己的本体论logical灭之间的真实关系。由于无法从现象学上描述这种an灭,因此,破坏性的真实性意味着,Dasein在一定程度上可以自由描述其死亡的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

联系方式:18141920177 (微信同号)

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号