首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Methods >Dissolving Dualisms: How Two Positivists Engaged With Non-Positivist Qualitative Methodology
【24h】

Dissolving Dualisms: How Two Positivists Engaged With Non-Positivist Qualitative Methodology

机译:化解二元论:两个实证主义者如何与非实证主义定性方法论交涉

获取原文
       

摘要

This is the story of how a chemical engineer and a medical microbiologist overcame their positivist training and deeply held disciplinary attitudes to engage with non-positivist qualitative methodology. Through a series of facilitated reflections they explored what helped and hindered their transition from positivist to non-positivist inquiry. To move forward they needed to acknowledge the extent and nature of the transition they were making, find metaphors to dissolve troubling dualisms, and balance a desire to reach out to others with the need to manage the very real sense of vulnerability that came with embracing subjectivity. Their experiences suggest that pragmatism may be a useful bridging framework for the growing number of academics from the science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) disciplines turning to qualitative methodologists for help to move beyond positivist research.
机译:这是一个故事,讲述了化学工程师和医学微生物学家如何克服他们的实证主义培训,并深入掌握纪律态度以使用非实证主义定性方法。通过一系列促进性的思考,他们探索了什么帮助和阻碍了他们从实证主义向非实证主义的转变。为了向前迈进,他们需要承认自己正在进行的过渡的程度和性质,找到隐喻来化解令人困扰的二元论,并在与他人接触的渴望与管理主观性带来的真正脆弱感之间取得平衡。他们的经验表明,对于越来越多的科学,技术,工程和数学(STEM)学科的学者转向定性方法论者寻求超越实证主义研究的帮助,实用主义可能是一个有用的桥梁框架。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号