首页> 外文期刊>Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology >Heidegger and Levinas: Metaphysics, Ontology and the Horizon of the Other
【24h】

Heidegger and Levinas: Metaphysics, Ontology and the Horizon of the Other

机译:海德格尔与列维纳斯:形而上学,本体论与他人视野

获取原文
       

摘要

Already in his earlier works Levinas proposes a distinct phenomenological project which takes into consideration the radicality of the other and otherness by questioning intentionality and the validity of intersubjectivity within intentional consciousness. His move “towards Heidegger and against Husserl” was due primarily to Heidegger’s Dasein analysis, understanding of Being and being-with. However, in his major work, Totality and Infinity , Levinas proposes a new perspective on reading intersubjective relations with the Other which strongly contrasts with the Heideggerian concept of intersubjectivity. This paper addresses the question of the Other, intersubjectivity and ethics in the writings of Levinas and Heidegger respectively. It considers Levinas’s critique of intersubjectivity as provoked and developed by Heidegger’s analytic of Dasein, and concentrates on Levinas’s specific understanding of intentionality in his account of metaphysics, metaphysical desire and the Other. It also takes up the question of temporality as a necessary condition for intersubjective relation and explores its implication for the self and the Other in Levinas’s and Heidegger’s respective philosophies.
机译:列维纳斯已经在他较早的著作中提出了一个独特的现象学计划,该计划通过质疑意图性和意图意识内的主体间性的有效性,考虑了他人和他人的激进性。他“迈向海德格尔并反对胡塞尔”的举动主要归功于海德格尔对本世的分析,对存在和存在的理解。然而,列维纳斯在他的主要著作《全面性与无限性》中提出了一种解读与他人之间的主体间关系的新观点,这与海德格尔的主体间性概念形成了鲜明的对比。本文分别论述了列维纳斯和海德格尔著作中的“他者”,主体间性和伦理学问题。该书认为,列维纳斯对主体间性的批判是海德格尔对达塞因的分析所激发和发展的,并集中于列维纳斯在形而上学,形而上学的欲望和他者的论述中对意图的特定理解。它还探讨了时间性问题,将其作为主体间关系的必要条件,并探讨了它对列维纳斯和海德格尔各自哲学中的自我和他人的暗示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号