首页> 外文期刊>Audiology - Communication Research >Interference of visual stimuli on the written production of students with no complaints of reading and writing difficulties
【24h】

Interference of visual stimuli on the written production of students with no complaints of reading and writing difficulties

机译:视觉刺激干扰学生的写作能力,而不会抱怨阅读和写作困难

获取原文
       

摘要

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of visual stimuli on the written production of Elementary School students with no complaints of reading and writing difficulties. METHODS: Participants were 25 Elementary School children without reading and writing complaints who were enrolled in 3rd and 4th grades of a public school. The following inclusion criteria were adopted: responses at 20 dBHL for frequencies from 500 Hz to 4 kHz on hearing screening; to be enrolled in school for at least two years; and to present alphabetic or orthographic writing level. Participants were divided into small groups, and the written productions were collected in two separate days. Productions were analyzed according to the criteria adopted, which were based on a study regarding communicative skills (generic, encyclopedic and linguistic). Data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: There was no difference in the duration of writing elaboration, regardless the type of visual stimulus. As for the generic skills, the predominant type of discourse was the narrative genre. Regarding the encyclopedic skills, there was evidence of greater intertextuality for the action picture. With regards to the linguistic skills, the produced texts were long, with inadequate score, orthographic errors and partial overall cohesion. CONCLUSION: The visual stimuli presented did not interfere in the written production of Elementary School students regarding communicative skills.
机译:目的:调查视觉刺激对小学生写作能力的影响,而不会抱怨阅读和写作困难。方法:参与者是25名没有读写投诉的小学儿童,他们被录取到公立学校的三年级和四年级。采用了以下纳入标准:听力筛查时从500 Hz到4 kHz的频率在20 dBHL下的响应;入学至少两年;并显示字母或拼写水平。参加者分为小组,并在两天内收集书面作品。根据所采用的标准对产品进行了分析,这些标准是基于一项关于交际技巧(通用,百科全书和语言学)的研究而制定的。对数据进行统计分析。结果:不论视觉刺激的类型如何,写作拟订的持续时间没有差异。至于共通能力,话语的主要类型是叙事体裁。关于百科全书技巧,有证据表明动作图片具有更大的互文性。关于语言技能,制作的文本很长,分数不足,拼字错误且部分整体衔接。结论:所呈现的视觉刺激不会干扰小学生关于沟通技巧的书面表达。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号