首页> 外文期刊>Creative Education >Chinese Vocational College English Teachers and Majors’ Perceptions of the Product Approach and Process Approach and Attitudes toward the Application of the Product Process Approach
【24h】

Chinese Vocational College English Teachers and Majors’ Perceptions of the Product Approach and Process Approach and Attitudes toward the Application of the Product Process Approach

机译:中国高职院校英语教师和专业学生对产品方法和过程方法的看法以及对产品过程方法应用的态度

获取原文
       

摘要

In this particular small-scale survey, questionnaires were sent to 50 students majoring in English and interviews with 4 teachers teaching English writing in vocational colleges were used to collect data. It is agreed that the traditional Product Approach to some extent was still useful due to learners’ insufficiency in English competency and the exam-oriented approach of the Chinese education system. However, the product-oriented pedagogy is argued to overlook learners’ creative thinking, problem-solving skills and the concept of the writing purpose and audience. Thus, the Process Approach is considered to be a much more sophisticated approach. Although the process writing has various advantages, it originated from L1 (English as a first language), which may not be wholly suitable to in an EFL (English as a foreign language) context. Hence, the adaptability and simplification of the original Process Approach are perceived to be significant. In addition, the main findings of the study indicated that both Chinese English teachers and majors held positive attitudes towards the Product Process Approach. They pointed out the synthesis might not only guarantee proper language input, but also enhance learners’ communication skills and strengthen their understanding of the multiple drafts, the writing purpose and the audience. It is suggested that the synthesis might be useful if the two approaches are properly balanced according to different students’ levels and various genres. The limitation of this study was the small sample that could not represent all the Chinese university teachers and students’ views. In addition, it needs long-term empirical studies to further examine the validity and reliability of the synthesis.
机译:在这个特殊的小规模调查中,向50名英语专业的学生发送了问卷,并与4名职业学院教授英语写作的老师进行了访谈,以收集数据。人们同意,由于学习者英语能力不足和中文教育系统的考试导向方法,传统的产品方法在某种程度上仍然有用。但是,以产品为导向的教学法被认为忽略了学习者的创造性思维,解决问题的能力以及写作目的和受众的概念。因此,过程方法被认为是一种更为复杂的方法。尽管过程编写具有各种优点,但它起源于L1(英语作为第一语言),可能不完全适合EFL(英语作为外语)环境。因此,原始过程方法的适应性和简化性被认为是重要的。此外,研究的主要结果表明,中文英语教师和专业人士都对产品过程方法持积极态度。他们指出,综合不仅可以保证适当的语言输入,而且可以提高学习者的沟通技巧,并增强他们对多种草稿,写作目的和听众的理解。建议如果根据不同学生的水平和流派适当地平衡两种方法,则综合可能会有用。本研究的局限性在于样本量太小,不能代表所有中国大学教师和学生的观点。此外,还需要长期的经验研究来进一步检验合成的有效性和可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号