首页> 外文期刊>CBE Life Sciences Education >A Combination of Hand-held Models and Computer Imaging Programs Helps Students Answer Oral Questions about Molecular Structure and Function: A Controlled Investigation of Student Learning
【24h】

A Combination of Hand-held Models and Computer Imaging Programs Helps Students Answer Oral Questions about Molecular Structure and Function: A Controlled Investigation of Student Learning

机译:手持模型和计算机成像程序的组合可帮助学生回答有关分子结构和功能的口头问题:对学生学习的对照研究

获取原文
       

摘要

We conducted a controlled investigation to examine whether a combination of computer imagery and tactile tools helps introductory cell biology laboratory undergraduate students better learn about protein structure/function relationships as compared with computer imagery alone. In all five laboratory sections, students used the molecular imaging program, Protein Explorer (PE). In the three experimental sections, three-dimensional physical models were made available to the students, in addition to PE. Student learning was assessed via oral and written research summaries and videotaped interviews. Differences between the experimental and control group students were not found in our typical course assessments such as research papers, but rather were revealed during one-on-one interviews with students at the end of the semester. A subset of students in the experimental group produced superior answers to some higher-order interview questions as compared with students in the control group. During the interview, students in both groups preferred to use either the hand-held models alone or in combination with the PE imaging program. Students typically did not use any tools when answering knowledge (lower-level thinking) questions, but when challenged with higher-level thinking questions, students in both the control and experimental groups elected to use the models.
机译:我们进行了一项对照调查,以检查计算机影像和触觉工具的组合是否比单独使用计算机影像能更好地帮助介绍性细胞生物学实验室的本科生更好地了解蛋白质的结构/功能关系。在所有五个实验室部分中,学生都使用了分子成像程序Protein Explorer(PE)。在三个实验部分中,除了体育课外,还向学生提供了三维物理模型。通过口头和书面研究摘要以及录像采访对学生的学习进行评估。实验性和对照组学生之间的差异未在我们的典型课程评估(例如研究论文)中发现,而是在学期末与学生进行的一对一访谈中发现的。与对照组相比,实验组的一部分学生对一些高阶面试问题的回答更好。在面试期间,两组学生都倾向于单独使用手持模型或与PE成像程序结合使用。在回答知识(低级思维)问题时,学生通常不使用任何工具,但是在遇到高级思维问题时,对照组和实验组的学生都选择使用模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号