首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation
【24h】

The tidal volume challenge improves the reliability of dynamic preload indices during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position with lung-protective ventilation

机译:潮气量挑战提高了在特德伦堡堡腹腔镜机器人辅助腹腔镜手术中采用肺保护通气进行动态预紧指数的可靠性

获取原文
       

摘要

The reliability of pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) is controversial under pneumoperitoneum. In addition, the usefulness of these indices is being called into question with the increasing adoption of lung-protective ventilation using low tidal volume (VT) in surgical patients. A recent study indicated that changes in PPV or SVV obtained by transiently increasing VT (VT challenge) accurately predicted fluid responsiveness even in critically ill patients receiving low VT. We evaluated whether the changes in PPV and SVV induced by a VT challenge predicted fluid responsiveness during pneumoperitoneum. We performed an interventional prospective study in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the Trendelenburg position under lung-protective ventilation. PPV, SVV, and the stroke volume index (SVI) were measured at a VT of 6?mL/kg and 3?min after increasing the VT to 8?mL/kg. The VT was reduced to 6?mL/kg, and measurements were performed before and 5?min after volume expansion (infusing 6% hydroxyethyl starch 6?ml/kg over 10?min). Fluid responsiveness was defined as ≥15% increase in the SVI. Twenty-four of the 38 patients enrolled in the study were responders. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an increase in PPV??1% after the VT challenge showed excellent predictive capability for fluid responsiveness, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.95 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83–0.99, P 2% after the VT challenge predicted fluid responsiveness, but showed only fair predictive capability, with an AUC of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.60–0.89, P??0.0006; sensitivity 46%, specificity 100%). The augmented values of PPV and SVV following VT challenge also showed the improved predictability of fluid responsiveness compared to PPV and SVV values (as measured by VT) of 6?ml/kg. The change in PPV following the VT challenge has excellent reliability in predicting fluid responsiveness in our surgical population. The change in SVV and augmented values of PPV and SVV following this test are also reliable. This trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03467711 , 10th March 2018.
机译:在气腹下,脉压变化(PPV)和搏动量变化(SVV)的可靠性存在争议。另外,随着手术患者使用低潮气量(VT)的肺保护通气的采用日益普及,这些指标的有效性受到质疑。最近的一项研究表明,即使在重症患者接受低VT的情况下,通过暂时增加VT(VT挑战)而获得的PPV或SVV的变化也可以准确预测流体反应。我们评估了VT挑战引起的PPV和SVV的变化是否预测了气腹期间的液体反应性。我们对在肺保护通气下在特伦德伦伯卧位接受机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的患者进行了一项干预性前瞻性研究。将VT增加到8?mL / kg后,以6?mL / kg的VT和3?min测量PPV,SVV和中风量指数(SVI)。 VT降低至6?mL / kg,并在体积膨胀之前和之后5?min进行测量(在10?min内注入6%羟乙基淀粉6?ml / kg)。流体反应性定义为SVI≥15%的增加。参与该研究的38位患者中有24位是有反应者。在接收器工作特性曲线分析中,VT挑战后PPV?>?1%的增加显示出出色的流体响应预测能力,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.95 [95%置信区间(CI),0.83 –0.99,VT挑战后的P 2%预测液体反应性,但仅显示出合理的预测能力,AUC为0.76(95%CI,0.60-0.89,P 0.0006;敏感性46%,特异性100%)。与6?ml / kg的PPV和SVV值(通过VT测量)相比,VT挑战后PPV和SVV的增高值还显示出更高的流体反应性可预测性。 VT挑战后PPV的变化在预测我们手术人群的液体反应性方面具有出色的可靠性。此测试后,SVV的变化以及PPV和SVV的增加值也是可靠的。该试验已于2018年3月10日在Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03467711上注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号