首页> 外文学位 >Assessment of Information Literacy Instruction.
【24h】

Assessment of Information Literacy Instruction.

机译:信息素养教学评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Information Literacy Instruction (ILI) is a topic of increasing importance and interest to the library community and especially to academic librarians. The assessment of ILI is also of increasing importance, as institutions seek to improve the effectiveness of their ILI programs and as they are required to provide evidence of this effectiveness both internally and to external agencies and the public. While many types of assessment methods have been used for ILI, the focus of this research was to analyze three specific methods: (a) pre- and post-test questionnaire, (b) reflective essay, and (c) experiential research task final exam. These data were collected as part of the classroom assessment of university freshmen students taking a required library class in the fall quarter of 2008. Aggregate summary data were analyzed for each of five classes. Students were not identified, and only class averages were reviewed. Summary data from the pre- and post-test questionnaires collected for the fall quarters over a four-year period were also compared. The results of the analysis indicated that the pre-/post-test questionnaire was not a reliable method for assessing student success. The reflective essay grades and the experiential final exam grades each were significantly higher than the post-test questionnaire scores, suggesting that these methods were more valid assessment methods of student learning. The historical questionnaire data did not indicate any consistent trends in student learning over the four-year period. More research on the reflective essay and experiential final exam as ILI assessment methods was suggested.
机译:信息素养教育(ILI)是一个越来越重要的话题,对图书馆界,尤其是对学术图书馆员来说,越来越重要。随着机构寻求提高其ILI计划的有效性,并且要求它们在内部以及向外部机构和公众提供这种有效性的证据,对ILI的评估也变得越来越重要。虽然ILI已使用多种评估方法,但本研究的重点是分析三种特定方法:(a)测试前和测试后问卷,(b)反思性论文和(c)经验研究任务期末考试。这些数据是在2008年秋季季度对要求图书馆课程的大学新生进行课堂评估的过程中收集的。对五个班级中每个班级的汇总摘要数据进行了分析。未确定学生身份,仅审查班级平均水平。还比较了在四年期间从秋季季度收集的测试前和测试后问卷中获得的摘要数据。分析结果表明,测试前/测试后问卷不是评估学生成功率的可靠方法。反思性论文等级和体验式期末考试等级均显着高于测试后问卷调查分数,表明这些方法是更有效的学生学习评估方法。历史调查表数据未显示四年期间学生学习的任何一致趋势。建议对反射性论文和体验式期末考试作为ILI评估方法进行更多研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gross, David E.;

  • 作者单位

    San Jose State University.;

  • 授予单位 San Jose State University.;
  • 学科 Library Science.;Education Higher.
  • 学位 M.L.I.S.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 52 p.
  • 总页数 52
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 图书馆学、图书馆事业;高等教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:37:39

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号