...
首页> 外文期刊>ZDM >Doubtful rationality
【24h】

Doubtful rationality

机译:令人怀疑的合理性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The paper addresses the following two questions: (1) How can we conceptualise possible socio-political roles of mathematics-based rationality? (2) How can we conceptualise possible the socio-political roles of mathematics education? Together the two questions might help to shed some light on how mathematical rationality might assume different forms and become integrated into social and technological development. It is pointed out how mathematics-based rationality forms part of the fabrication of possibilities, strategies, facts, contingencies, and perspectives. There is, however, no inherent quality to be associated with such mathematics-based fabrications. It is considered to what extent the school mathematics tradition could establish a prescription readiness by submitting students to a school-mathematics absolutism; and to what extent this tradition could facilitate differentiated labelling of the students, as well as endorsement of an ethical filter. These aspects could be important functions of the school mathematics tradition in today’s knowledge society. It is considered to what extent mathematics education could prepare people for critical citizenship, which includes a potential for ‘talking back’ to authority. I do not see such preparation as being related to the school mathematics tradition, nor do I see it as linked to the very nature of mathematics. Rather, I am proposing it as a possible function of mathematics education.
机译:本文提出以下两个问题:(1)我们如何概念化基于数学的理性的可能的社会政治角色? (2)我们如何概念化数学教育的社会政治角色?这两个问题可能有助于阐明数学合理性如何采用不同的形式并融入社会和技术发展。需要指出的是,基于数学的理性是如何构成可能性,策略,事实,偶发事件和观点的一部分。但是,与这种基于数学的制造没有内在的联系。通过考虑让学生服从学校数学专制主义,学校数学传统可以在多大程度上建立处方准备;以及这种传统可以在多大程度上促进对学生的差异化标签,以及对道德过滤器的认可。这些方面可能是当今知识社会中学校数学传统的重要功能。人们认为数学教育可以在多大程度上使人们为获得关键的公民身份做好准备,其中包括“与权威交流”的潜力。我认为这种准备与学校的数学传统无关,也与数学的本质无关。相反,我提议将其作为数学教育的可能功能。

著录项

  • 来源
    《ZDM 》 |2007年第3期| 215-224| 共10页
  • 作者

    Ole Skovsmose;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Education, Learning and Philosophy, Aalborg University, Fibigerstr?de 10, 9220 Aalborg East, Denmark;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号