【24h】

Co-Creator or Creative Predator?

机译:共同创作者还是创意掠食者?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

While the Catholic Church's official teaching on the environment presents a hopeful and comprehensive ecological ethic rooted in the goodness of creation and humanity's privileged role as co-creator, it does not sufficiently account for the violence of predation and humanity's necessary participation in it. James Nash's understanding of humans as altruistic, creative predators can further Catholic ecological ethics because it strikes a better balance between humanity's call to love creation and the moral ambiguity of the evolutionary process. Humans as creative predators suggests three new understandings of what ecological sacrifice could entail: 1) to see the death of every creature, even if a morally justifiable death, as a kind of sacrifice; 2) to recognize that ecological sustainability may demand dramatic and subversive shifts in behavior; and 3) to sacrifice our tendency to view nonhumans instrumentally by advocating a Biotic Bill of Rights.
机译:天主教会关于环境的官方教导提出了一种希望而全面的生态伦理学,其根源在于创造的美好和人类作为共同创造者的特权,但它并不能充分说明掠夺和人类必要参与暴力行为。詹姆斯·纳什(James Nash)将人类理解为无私的,有创造力的掠食者的理解可以促进天主教的生态伦理,因为它在人类对创造爱的呼吁与进化过程的道德歧义之间取得了更好的平衡。人类作为有创造力的掠食者提出了关于生态牺牲可能带来的三种新认识:1)将每个生物的死亡,即使在道德上合理的死亡,都视为一种牺牲; 2)认识到生态可持续性可能要求行为发生戏剧性和颠覆性变化; 3)通过倡导《生物权利法案》,牺牲我们从工具上看待非人类的倾向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号