首页> 外文期刊>Women's History Review >Sexuality in Heterotopia: time, space and love between women in the historic house
【24h】

Sexuality in Heterotopia: time, space and love between women in the historic house

机译:异性恋中的性行为:这座历史悠久的房子中女性之间的时间,空间和爱情

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The presentation of historic houses in Britain generally reflects dominant ideas about the national past, and mobilises familiar narratives about aristocracy, class, lineage and family in order to forge a sense of stability and national identity. While the representation of women, ethnic and national identities and sexuality has been widely contested and debated in museum studies over recent years, these themes remain under-explored in the literature on historic houses as heritage, despite their huge importance for public history and its relationship to academic history, public policy and visitor demands. Does the heritage industry construct normatively gendered and heterosexualised space in presenting the historic house to the visitor? This essay will use two case studies of historic houses associated with women who led unconventional lives, Shibden Hall, near Halifax and Sissinghust in Kent, to push forward debate and analysis. It will question whether there is a unified or necessarily conservative approach to sexuality in the heritage industry and tease out some interesting complexities around sexed and gendered space.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2012.658178
机译:英国历史性房屋的介绍通常反映了关于民族过去的主导思想,并动员了有关贵族,阶级,宗族和家庭的熟悉叙事,以营造一种稳定感和民族认同感。尽管近年来在博物馆研究中对妇女的代表,种族和民族身份以及性行为进行了广泛的辩论和辩论,但这些主题在历史建筑作为遗产的文献中仍未得到充分探讨,尽管它们对公共历史及其关系具有重要意义。学术历史,公共政策和访客需求。在向游客展示这座历史悠久的房屋时,文化遗产行业是否会构建规范化的性别和异性恋空间?本文将使用两个与非常规生活相关的妇女的历史房屋案例研究,即哈利法克斯附近的Shibden Hall和肯特的Sissinghust,来推动辩论和分析。它将质疑在遗产行业中是否存在统一或必要的保守性方法,并挑逗围绕性别空间的一些有趣的复杂性。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact: “ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”}; var addthis_config = {“ data_track_addressbar”:true,“ ui_click”:true};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09612025.2012.658178

著录项

  • 来源
    《Women's History Review》 |2012年第4期|533-551|共19页
  • 作者

    Alison Oram;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:05:24

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号