首页> 外文期刊>Wired >A question about your piece on the Estonia cyber-attack: If you can identify the source, can't you just send a salvo of your own back down the same pipeline?
【24h】

A question about your piece on the Estonia cyber-attack: If you can identify the source, can't you just send a salvo of your own back down the same pipeline?

机译:有关您在爱沙尼亚网络攻击中的作品的一个问题:如果您可以识别出来源,您是否不能仅将自己的同伙发送给同一渠道?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Why take shots at the Opie and Anthony show in an article on a new technology (Start, "Eavesdropping on Your Musical Life," issue 15.09)? O&A will be popular no matter what kind of rating system you use. Lots of listeners are still lots of listeners, even when you apply a new technology for measurement. Look at the number of message boards devoted to O&A. Look at the newsgroups. Look at the satellite show. And come on-you may not like them, but calling them twits is way out of line.
机译:为什么在有关新技术的文章(开始,“窃听音乐生活”,第15.09期)中对Opie和Anthony的节目拍摄照片?无论您使用哪种评级系统,O&A都会很受欢迎。即使使用新技术进行测量,很多听众仍然是很多听众。查看专门用于O&A的留言板的数量。查看新闻组。看卫星节目。来吧,您可能不喜欢它们,但称它们为twit是不合时宜的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号