首页> 外文期刊>Wilderness and Environmental Medicine >Food for High-Altitude Expeditions: Pugh Got It Right in 1954—A Commentary on the Report by L.G.C.E. Pugh: “Himalayan Rations With Special Reference to the 1953 Expedition to Mount Everest”
【24h】

Food for High-Altitude Expeditions: Pugh Got It Right in 1954—A Commentary on the Report by L.G.C.E. Pugh: “Himalayan Rations With Special Reference to the 1953 Expedition to Mount Everest”

机译:高海拔探险的粮食:1954年,普格(Pugh)做对了— L.G.C.E.的报告评论普格:“喜马拉雅口粮,特别提及1953年的珠穆朗玛峰探险”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Few scholarly discussions of high-altitude physiology would be complete without reference to the work and writings of L.G.C.E. Pugh. Pugh was a physician, an avid outdoorsman, and a perceptive scientist (a “salty dog” in Wilderness Medical Society former President Blair Erb's terminology). Pugh clearly had some strong opinions about the role of diet and its relationship to performance at altitude garnered from first-hand observations. Ironically, many of his conclusions on nutrition, if presented for publication to journals today, perhaps might be found a bit “anecdotal” and lacking in data-based “rigor” to substantiate some of his claims. However, a careful examination of his conclusions and a comparison to developments during the ensuing 50 years lead the modern nutrition scientist to conclude that Pugh's conclusions and recommendations are, with few exceptions, as valid today as they were 50 years ago when he first published “Himalayan Rations with Special Reference to the 1953 Expedition to Mount Everest.”1
机译:在不参考L.G.C.E.的工作和著作的情况下,很少有学者会完成关于高海拔生理学的学术讨论。 gh Pugh是位医师,狂热的户外活动家和敏锐的科学家(原野医学协会前主席布莱尔·埃尔布(Blair Erb)的术语中的“咸狗”)。普格显然对饮食的作用及其与海拔的表现之间的关系有很强的见解,这是通过第一手观察得出的。具有讽刺意味的是,如果将他关于营养的许多结论提交给今天的期刊,也许会发现有些“轶事”,并且缺乏基于数据的“严谨性”来证实他的某些主张。但是,仔细研究他的结论并与随后50年的发展进行比较,现代营养学家得出的结论是,Pugh的结论和建议几乎没有什么例外,今天和50年前他首次发表时一样有效。喜马拉雅口粮,特别提及1953年的珠穆朗玛峰探险。” 1

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号