首页> 外文期刊>Wilderness and Environmental Medicine >A Comparison of Bacterial Colony-Forming Units in Water Bottles and Hydration Bags Among Outdoor Enthusiasts
【24h】

A Comparison of Bacterial Colony-Forming Units in Water Bottles and Hydration Bags Among Outdoor Enthusiasts

机译:户外运动爱好者水瓶和水化袋中细菌菌落形成单位的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective.—Transporting clean drinking water in an easily accessible container is a priority for many outdoor enthusiasts. Two basic hydration systems are commonly used to provide water: the water bottle and the hydration bladder. The authors tested the hypothesis that there were different levels of microbiologic contamination between these 2 systems.Methods.—Sixty-seven water samples were collected using sterile techniques from outdoor enthusiasts at several outdoor recreational locations. These users were then asked to complete a brief survey that reported demographic information and details of water container use. Water samples were then plated on sheep blood agar, and the colony-forming units were counted after 24 hours of growth. The 2 groups were compared using Student's t test.Results.—The 2 groups using water bottles or hydration bladders did not show significant differences in container age, duration of outdoor activity, or duration since last cleaning. The groups differed slightly in their composition of hikers/walkers/runners vs cyclists. The water bottle group had a mean colony-forming unit count per 100 mL of 37 (95% CI 26–48), and the hydration bladder had a mean of 27 (95% CI 17–35).Conclusions.—There was no statistically significant difference between hydration bladders and water bottles in microbial contamination or colonization. Judging from the available data, outdoor enthusiasts should select their water container based on criteria other than the relative exposure to microbes. Additional study is required to replicate this finding in other locations and with improved sample methodology.
机译:目标。将清洁的饮用水装在易于取用的容器中是许多户外运动爱好者的首要任务。通常使用两种基本的水化系统来提供水:水瓶和水化囊。作者检验了在这两个系统之间存在不同程度的微生物污染的假设。方法:使用无菌技术从多个户外娱乐场所的户外爱好者那里收集了67个水样本。然后要求这些用户完成简短的调查,该调查报告了人口统计信息和水容器使用的详细信息。然后将水样品铺在羊血琼脂上,生长24小时后计数菌落形成单位。使用学生t检验比较了两组。结果。使用水瓶或水囊的两组在容器使用年限,户外活动的持续时间或自上次清洁以来的持续时间方面没有显着差异。这些组的徒步旅行者/步行者/跑步者与骑自行车者的构成略有不同。水瓶组每100 mL的平均菌落形成单位数为37(95%CI 26-48),而水化膀胱的平均值为27(95%CI 17-35)。结论。在水合膀胱和水瓶之间的微生物污染或定植,具有统计学意义。从可用数据来看,户外运动爱好者应根据除相对暴露于微生物之外的标准选择水容器。需要进行其他研究才能在其他位置和改进的样本方法中重复这一发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号