...
首页> 外文期刊>Weed Technology >Comparison of Glyphosate Products in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and Corn (Zea mays)1
【24h】

Comparison of Glyphosate Products in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and Corn (Zea mays)1

机译:抗草甘膦棉花(棉)和玉米(玉米)的草甘膦产品比较 1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Wide-spread planting of glyphosate-resistant (GR) crops in the United States and glyphosate patent expiration has led to a proliferation of glyphosate products. Growers have questioned their advisors on efficacy and crop tolerance of the many products available. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate eight glyphosate products in 2002 and ten in 2003, representing isopropylamine, diammonium, and potassium salts, applied POST and postemergence-directed (PDIR) at 630 and 1,680 g ae/ha for GR corn and GR cotton tolerance and weed control. There were no differences among products for control of six annual grass and 10 annual broadleaf weed species. No injury to corn from any glyphosate product at 630 or 1,680 g/ha or to cotton from 630 g/ha was noted at any of seven locations. ClearOut 41 Plus™, an isopropylamine salt of glyphosate, and Roundup WEATHERMAX™, a potassium salt of glyphosate, applied POST at 1,680 g/ha injured cotton 27 to 30% and 10 to 17%, respectively, at 3 of 7 locations. No cotton injury was noted with Glyfos®, Glyfos® X-TRA, Glyphomax™, Gly Star™ Original, Roundup Original™, Roundup UltraMAX®, Touchdown®, or Touchdown Total™. No differences were noted among glyphosate products or between rates for corn or cotton yield or cotton fiber properties.
机译:在美国,抗草甘膦(GR)作物的广泛种植以及草甘膦专利的到期已导致草甘膦​​产品的泛滥。种植者对他们的顾问提出了许多可用产品的功效和作物耐受性的质疑。进行了田间试验,以评估2002年的8种草甘膦产品和2003年的10种草甘膦产品,分别代表异丙胺,二铵和钾盐,分别以630和1,680 g ae / ha的POST和出苗后定向(PDIR)进行GR玉米和GR棉花的耐性鉴定。杂草防治。用于控制6种一年生草和10种一年生阔叶杂草的产品之间没有差异。在七个地点中,没有发现任何草甘膦产品以630或1,680 g / ha对玉米的伤害或630 g / ha对棉花的伤害。草甘膦的异丙基胺盐ClearOut 41 Plus™和草甘膦的钾盐Roundup WEATHERMAX™在7个位置中的3个位置分别以1,680 g / ha的受害棉量施用了POST,含27%至30%和10%至17%。 Glyfos®,Glyfos®X-TRA,Glyphomax™,Gly Star™Original,Roundup Original™,RoundupUltraMAX®,Touchdown®或Touchdown Total™均未发现棉花损伤。草甘膦产品之间或玉米或棉花产量或棉花纤维特性的速率之间未发现差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号