首页> 外文期刊>Water, Air, & Soil Pollution >Evaluation of Physicochemical Methods for Treatment of Cu, Pb, Sb, and Zn in Canadian Small Arm Firing Ranges Backstop Soils
【24h】

Evaluation of Physicochemical Methods for Treatment of Cu, Pb, Sb, and Zn in Canadian Small Arm Firing Ranges Backstop Soils

机译:理化方法评价加拿大小臂射击靶场土层中Cu,Pb,Sb和Zn的理化方法评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper presents the results of physicochemical treatment on Pb-, Cu-, Sb-, and Zn-contaminated Canadian small arm firing range (SAFR) backstop soils in order to evaluate the potential of such methods for remediation of SAFR backstop soils. Remediation target for the treatment assays was to attain the Québec Department of Environment commercial C criterion or more realistically, to reach the soil burial D criterion. Two treatment lines (TL) were evaluated. TL-1, consisting of jig and Wilfley table (WT) treatments on the 0.5–3 mm and 53–500 μm soil size fractions (SF), respectively, and chemical leaching on the 4 mm for TL-2), and the gravimetric separation concentrates could be sent for recycling in smelter facilities. Results showed that the finer SF (<53 μm SF for TL-1; <250 μm SF for TL-2) were very difficult to treat. Even with metal removed mass proportions up to 78% for Pb, concentrations were still very high after chemical leaching; and the Kelsey jig showed deceiving metal removed mass proportions (up to 47% for Pb). In both TL, the jig and the WT showed Pb removed mass proportions up to 98% and treated mass proportions up to 77% in their respective SF. Whole process efficiencies in the cleaned soils showed that TL-1 led to the remediation of up to 65% of the initial total soil, and TL-2, 36%. TL-1 and TL-2 results showed that the WT effectively treated soils of 53 μm–1 mm SF, and the jig, soils of the 1–4 mm SF. Our study shows that gravimetric concentration techniques are very promising for the treatment of SAFR backstop soils, and further research has to be done in order to treat the SF lower than 53 μm.
机译:本文介绍了对受Pb,Cu,Sb和Zn污染的加拿大小臂燃烧范围(SAFR)支撑土进行理化处理的结果,以便评估这种方法修复SAFR支撑土的潜力。处理测定的修复目标是达到魁北克环境部的商品C标准,或更实际地达到土壤埋葬D标准。评价了两个处理线(TL)。 TL-1,包括分别在0.5–3 mm和53–500μm的土壤粒径级分(SF)上进行的夹具和Wilfley工作台(WT)处理,以及对于TL-2在4 mm上的化学浸出处理,以及重量分析法分离精矿可以送往冶炼厂进行回收。结果表明,较细的SF(TL-1 <53μmSF; TL-2 <250μmSF)很难治疗。即使金属去除的铅的质量比例高达78%,化学浸出后的浓度仍然很高。凯尔西(Kelsey)夹具显示出欺骗性的去除了金属的质量比例(铅的含量高达47%)。在TL中,夹具和WT均显示其各自SF中Pb的去除质量比例高达98%,处理的质量比例高达77%。清洁土壤的全过程效率表明,TL-1导致的修复率最高可达初始总土壤的65%,而TL-2的修复率高达36%。 TL-1和TL-2结果表明,WT有效处理了53 μm–1 ​​mm SF的土壤,以及夹具处理了1–4 mm SF的土壤。我们的研究表明,重量法浓缩技术对于处理SAFR支撑土非常有前途,并且需要做进一步的研究以处理低于53μm的SF。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号