首页> 外文期刊>Urban Studies >Governing urbanism: Urban governance studies 1.0, 2.0 and beyond
【24h】

Governing urbanism: Urban governance studies 1.0, 2.0 and beyond

机译:治理城市主义:城市治理研究1.0、2.0及更高版本

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Governance has been a key concept in urban studies since the late 1980s. This paper reflects on its use and development over the past 25 years and identifies contemporary innovations and concerns that will likely define the future of urban governance studies. The paper argues that to fully understand the impacts of governance approaches on our understanding of cities, urban regions and global urbanism, we must address how urbanism, rather than urbanisation, is governed. An attention to urbanism highlights a wider range of scholarly work on how the mutually constitutive relationships between the development of built environments and the identities, practices, struggles and opportunities of everyday social life are governed. In introducing 15 contributions from the archives of Urban Studies, the paper employs a heuristic framing - urban governance studies (UGS) 1.0, 2.0, and beyond - to show that, while governance as a contemporary critical concept gained prominence through the work of Marxian political economists concerned largely with urbanisation (UGS 1.0), other work, analysing the governance of other aspects of urbanism, including identity and citizenship (UGS 2.0), also has a significant history. The paper then points to ways in which urban governance studies grapple with future- defining challenges, such as climate change, and new framings, such as the ` smart city', while extending the scope of their analyses both temporally and spatially. The paper concludes by pointing to gaps and potential topics for ongoing attention.
机译:自1980年代后期以来,治理一直是城市研究中的关键概念。本文回顾了它在过去25年中的使用和发展,并指出了当代创新和关注点,这些关注点和关注点很可能将定义城市治理研究的未来。本文认为,要充分理解治理方法对我们对城市,城市地区和全球城市主义的理解的影响,我们必须解决如何治理城市主义而不是城市化问题。对城市主义的关注突出了关于如何控制建筑环境的发展与日常社会生活的身份,实践,斗争和机会之间的相互构成关系的学术研究。在介绍城市研究档案的15篇论文时,本文采用了启发式框架-城市治理研究(UGS)1.0、2.0及以后的版本-表明,尽管治理作为一种现代的批判概念在马克思主义政治工作中得到了重视与城市化(UGS 1.0)以及其他工作有关的经济学家在分析城市主义其他方面(包括身份和公民身份)(UGS 2.0)的治理方面也有重要的历史。然后,本文指出了城市治理研究如何应对诸如气候变化等未来定义的挑战以及诸如“智慧城市”之类的新框架,同时扩展了其在时间和空间上的分析范围。本文最后指出了需要不断关注的差距和潜在主题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号