首页> 外文期刊>Urban forum >'Day Labour' and 'Xenophobia' in South Africa: the Need for Mixed Methods Approaches in Policy-Orientated Research
【24h】

'Day Labour' and 'Xenophobia' in South Africa: the Need for Mixed Methods Approaches in Policy-Orientated Research

机译:南非的“日间劳动”和“仇外心理”:面向政策的研究需要混合方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Much policy-orientated research in South Africa relies solely on large-scale surveys. Little or no case study research is undertaken as part of studies despite broad international acknowledgement of the benefits of mixing methods. In the South African poverty and demographic literature, strong arguments have been made for the incorporation of case study approaches to arrive at a deeper and more accurate understanding of social phenomena. This paper, which draws on an ethnographic study of 'day labourers' (both South African and foreign) in Cape Town, together with an extensive range of relevant literature, extends this line of argument to research on casual employment and relations between South Africans and foreign nationals. It highlights a number of questionable assumptions and superficial analyses present in previous survey-based research on these topics. It also discusses the potential contribution of more case study work and some of the practical issues associated with linking methodologies in development research.
机译:南非许多以政策为导向的研究完全依赖于大规模调查。尽管国际上广泛认可混合方法的优点,但很少或没有案例研究作为研究的一部分。在南非的贫困和人口统计学文献中,人们强烈主张将案例研究方法纳入其中,以便对社会现象有更深入,更准确的理解。本文基于对开普敦“临时工”(包括南非人和外国人)的人种学研究,以及广泛的相关文献资料,将这一论点扩展到了休闲就业以及南非人与非洲人之间的关系的研究。外国公民。它突出显示了以前有关这些主题的基于调查的研究中存在的许多可疑假设和表面分析。它还讨论了更多案例研究工作的潜在贡献以及与开发研究中的链接方法相关的一些实际问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号