首页> 外文期刊>twentieth-century music >Ignacio Corona and Alejandro L. Madrid, eds, Postnational Musical Identities: Cultural Production, Distribution, and Consumption in a Globalized Scenario (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2008), ISBN 978-0-7391-1821-4 (hb), 978-0-7391-1822-1 (pb)
【24h】

Ignacio Corona and Alejandro L. Madrid, eds, Postnational Musical Identities: Cultural Production, Distribution, and Consumption in a Globalized Scenario (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2008), ISBN 978-0-7391-1821-4 (hb), 978-0-7391-1822-1 (pb)

机译:Ignacio Corona和Alejandro L.Madrid,编辑,《后民族音乐身份:全球化场景下的文化生产,发行和消费》(兰纳姆,马里兰州:列克星敦图书,2008年),ISBN 978-0-7391-1821-4(hb), 978-0-7391-1822-1(PB)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Musicology does not want for titles that speak of the global order, of space, place, and identity, of the local and the national – but the postnational marks a relatively new departure. The editors seek not to herald the downfall of the nation, but instead to contest whether the boundaries of the nation are the most useful way to delimit an imagined audience or to understand the performance of identity through music. Ignacio Corona and Alejandro Madrid's introductory chapter traces the growing importance of geographical markers in the production, distribution, and marketing of music, from the use of ‘world sounds’ in progressive music through the development of the marketing category ‘world music’ to the urban and global lounge. Corona and Madrid's work seeks to problematize attempts to ascribe a universal criterion of value and significance to such music. Music, they argue, is understood at the nexus of production, distribution, performance, and consumption. Their call for a careful contextualization of music emerges out of a strong belief that musical meaning arises out of contingent practices including performance, location, and sociocultural context. The postnational, they conclude, is an effective context for understanding music today, at a time when (as Martin Stokes suggested several years ago) ideas, cultures, and identities can no longer be unproblematically and securely held in place by the boundaries of the nation-state.1
机译:音乐学不希望使用能说出本地和国家/地区的全球秩序,空间,位置和身份的名称,但后国家的名称则相对较新。编辑们并不试图宣扬民族的灭亡,而是要争论民族的边界是否是界定想象中的听众或通过音乐了解身份表现的最有用方法。伊格纳西奥·科罗纳(Ignacio Corona)和亚历杭德罗·马德里(Alejandro Madrid)的介绍性章节追溯了地理标志在音乐的生产,发行和营销中的重要性,从在渐进音乐中使用“世界声音”到市场营销“世界音乐”发展到城市和全球休息室。 Corona和Madrid的工作力图将这种音乐的价值和重要性的普遍标准归因于尝试。他们认为,音乐是生产,发行,表演和消费之间的纽带。他们呼吁对音乐进行仔细的语境化是出于一种强烈的信念,即音乐意义源于偶然的实践,包括表演,地点和社会文化背景。他们得出结论,后国家时代是当今理解音乐的有效环境,而在这个时代(正如马丁·斯托克斯(Martin Stokes)几年前所建议的),思想,文化和身份不再可以毫无问题地,牢固地被国家边界所掌握状态。 1

著录项

  • 来源
    《twentieth-century music》 |2010年第01期|117-122|共6页
  • 作者

    JENNY TAMPLIN;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:06:21

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号