...
首页> 外文期刊>Transactions of the ASABE >MODELING EROSION FROM UNPAVED FOREST ROADS AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF GEOMETRIC DETAIL USING THE WEPP MODEL
【24h】

MODELING EROSION FROM UNPAVED FOREST ROADS AT VARIOUS LEVELS OF GEOMETRIC DETAIL USING THE WEPP MODEL

机译:使用WEPP模型对各种几何细节水平的未铺林路侵蚀进行建模

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study investigates the modeling question: “What level of geometric detail is necessary for modeling surface erosion from a forest road network?” We used the Water Erosion Prediction Project (WEPP) model to predict road sediment yield from a road network in a timber sale on the Boise National Forest, Idaho. Using three levels of detail (high, intermediate, and low), the outsloped 4.4 km road was divided into road segments (145, 91, and 42) of different lengths. The model predicted that 44, 44, and 42 metric tons per year of sediment would be produced from the 4.4 km road network based on the high, intermediate, and low detail methods, respectively. The model also predicted that a corresponding 0.036, 0.058, and 0.061 metric tons of sediment per year would be delivered into the stream system. Most sediment was predicted to be deposited in the buffer. For the predicted sediment produced from the roads, the total difference among the three methods was less than 5%, and regression analysis showed excellent correlation, with no practical differences among the three methods. For the quantity of sediment predicted to be delivered into the stream system from the road, the total difference among the methods was 61%, 67%, and 4% for high vs. intermediate, high vs. low, and intermediate vs. low, respectively. There were no strong correlations between the three methods, and the regression analysis indicated significant differences. More delivered sediment was predicted when using lower detail methods than when using higher detail methods. We conclude from the study results that the low detail method (i.e., considering only road grade reversal) can be used for input requirements of road traveled-way geometry, but that a high level of detail (i.e., dividing a road system into more road sections and considering buffer slope breaks and meanderings) is required for modeling the buffer slope geometry. Considering that the results were not sensitive to road traveled-way but were sensitive to buffer geometry, we believe it is advisable to divide a road network into road segments based on buffer geometry as opposed to road traveled-way geometry
机译:这项研究调查了以下建模问题:“对森林公路网的表面侵蚀进行建模所需的几何细节水平是什么?”我们使用水蚀预测项目(WEPP)模型来预测木材销售中公路网的道路泥沙产量。在爱达荷州博伊西国家森林上。使用三个详细级别(高,中和低),将超出坡度的4.4 km道路分为不同长度的路段(145、91和42)。该模型预测,根据高,中,低细节方法,分别从4.4 km的公路网中每年将分别产生44、44和42公吨的沉积物。该模型还预测,每年将有相应的0.036、0.058和0.061公吨的沉积物被输送到河流系统中。预计大多数沉淀物将沉积在缓冲液中。对于道路产生的预测沉积物,三种方法之间的总差异小于5%,回归分析显示出极好的相关性,三种方法之间没有实际差异。对于预计要从道路输送到河流系统中的泥沙量,对于高,中,高,低和中,低,方法之间的总差异为61%,67%和4%,分别。三种方法之间没有强相关性,回归分析表明存在显着差异。使用较低细节的方法比使用较高细节的方法预测会输送更多的沉积物。我们从研究结果中得出结论,低细节方法(即仅考虑道路坡度的逆转)可以用于道路行驶道路几何的输入要求,而细节层次高(即将道路系统划分为更多的道路)截面和考虑缓冲坡度折断和曲折)是建模缓冲坡度几何形状所必需的。考虑到结果对道路行驶不敏感,但对缓冲几何形状敏感,因此我们建议将道路网络基于缓冲几何形状而不是道路行驶几何形状划分为路段

著录项

  • 来源
    《Transactions of the ASABE》 |2004年第3期|p.961-968|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Hakjun Rhee, ASAE Student Member, Graduate Student, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;

    James L. Fridley, ASAE Member Engineer, Professor, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington;

    and Randy B. Flotz, ASAE Member Engineer, Research Engineer, USDA Forest Service, Moscow, Idaho. Corresponding author: James L. Fridley, Professor, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Box 352100, Seattle, WA 98195-2100;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Erosion; Forest roads; Geometry; Modeling; Road network; Sensitivity; WEPP;

    机译:侵蚀;林道;几何;造型;公路网;灵敏度;WEPP;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号