...
首页> 外文期刊>Traffic engineering & control >Removing traffic engineering control: the awkward truth?
【24h】

Removing traffic engineering control: the awkward truth?

机译:取消交通工程控制:尴尬的事实?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With data from only three trial sites where the effects of removing traffic control regulations, in these cases signal control, have been monitored (despite the significant level of scrutiny), it is not really possible to provide proof, or otherwise, of the Buchanan/Cassini hypothesis. It is clear that further research at a much greater number of junctions and network arrangements and over a longer period of time will be required before any satisfactory conclusions can be drawn. The trials have not been in operation for long enough to understand impact on road safety, and the issue of appropriate crossing facilities for vulnerable road users needs to be addressed rationally.
机译:仅使用来自三个试验场所的数据进行监测(在这种情况下,对交通管制法规的取消进行监控,在这种情况下为信号控制)(尽管进行了严格的审查),实际上不可能提供布坎南/的证据。卡西尼假设。显然,在得出任何令人满意的结论之前,将需要在更多的路口和网络布置以及更长的时间内进行进一步的研究。这些试验尚未进行足够长的时间,以了解对道路安全的影响,因此需要合理地解决为弱势道路使用者提供适当过境设施的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号