首页> 外文期刊>Tobacco control >Role of stakeholders in Nigeria's tobacco control journey after the FCTC: lessons for tobacco control advocacy in low-income and middle-income countries
【24h】

Role of stakeholders in Nigeria's tobacco control journey after the FCTC: lessons for tobacco control advocacy in low-income and middle-income countries

机译:利益相关方在《公约》之后的尼日利亚烟草控制旅程中的作用:在低收入和中等收入国家开展烟草控制宣传的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Introduction Nigeria ratified the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) in 2005. Tobacco control advocates in Nigeria achieved some success in countering tobacco industry interference to implement the FCTC.Methods We triangulated interviews with key informants from local and international organisations who worked in Nigeria with documentation of the legislative process and Nigerian newspaper articles. Data were analysed and interpreted using the Policy Dystopia Model and WHO categories of tobacco industry interference that had been developed mostly based on experience in high-income countries.Results As in high-income countries, the tobacco industry continued to oppose tobacco control policies after Nigeria ratified the FCTC, including weakening Nigeria's 2015 National Tobacco Control Act. Both tobacco control advocates and industry used discursive (argument-based) and instrumental (activity-based) strategies. The industry argued self-regulation and the economic importance of tobacco. They exploited legislative procedures, used front groups and third parties to push for pro-industry changes. Advocates, with help from international organisations, mobilised prominent Nigerians and the public. Advocates pre-empted and countered the industry through traditional and social media, monitoring and exposing tobacco industry activities, and by actively engaging lawmakers and citizens during the legislative process.Conclusion The Policy Dystopia Model and WHO categories of industry interference provide a helpful framework for understanding tobacco control debates in low/middle-income countries (LMICs) as in high-income countries. One difference in LMIC is the important role of international tobacco control advocates in supporting national tobacco control advocates. This partnership is important in pushing for FCTC-compliant legislation and countering industry activities in LMIC.
机译:引言尼日利亚于2005年批准了《世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约》(FCTC)。尼日利亚的烟草控制倡导者在抵抗烟草业对实施FCTC的干预方面取得了一些成功。方法我们对在尼日利亚工作的当地和国际组织的主要信息提供者进行了三角访谈以及有关立法程序的文件和尼日利亚报纸的文章。使用政策反乌托邦模型和WHO烟草业干预类别来分析和解释数据,这些类别主要根据高收入国家的经验制定。结果与高收入国家一样,烟草业在尼日利亚之后仍反对烟草控制政策。批准了《烟草控制框架公约》,包括削弱了尼日利亚的《 2015年国家烟草控制法》。控烟倡导者和烟草业都使用了话语(基于论据)和工具(基于活动)策略。烟草业认为自我调节和烟草的经济重要性。他们利用立法程序,利用前线团体和第三方推动有利于行业的变革。倡导者在国际组织的帮助下动员了知名的尼日利亚人和公众。倡导者通过传统和社交媒体,监测和公开烟草业活动以及在立法过程中积极参与立法者和公民来先发制人和制止该行业。结论政策反乌托邦模式和WHO的行业干预类别为理解提供了有益的框架中低收入国家(LMIC)中的烟草控制辩论与高收入国家中一样。 LMIC的差异之一是国际控烟倡导者在支持国家控烟倡导者中的重要作用。这种伙伴关系对于推动遵守FCTC的立法和应对LMIC中的行业活动至关重要。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Tobacco control》 |2019年第4期|386-393|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Tobacco Control Res & Educ, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA|South African Med Res Council, Alcohol Tobacco & Other Drug Res Unit, Pretoria, South Africa;

    Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Tobacco Control Res & Educ, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA|Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Nursing, Social & Behav Sci Dept, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA|Univ Calif San Francisco, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Helen Diller Family, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA;

    Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Tobacco Control Res & Educ, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA|Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med Cardiol, Cardiovasc Res Inst, Helen Diller Family Comprehens Canc Ctr,Philip R, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:21:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号