首页> 外文期刊>Time >Freedom Isn't Free
【24h】

Freedom Isn't Free

机译:自由不是自由

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The framers of the constitutionrnprotected freedom of the press, but they didn't mean that the press ought to be free in the sense that no one ought to pay for it. In fact, they believed that the cost of not having a free flow of information in a democracy was too high to pay. "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be," wrote Thomas Jefferson.rnThe central conversation in the media business these days is how to preserve and provide quality journalism and in-depth reporting at a time when consumers and readers expect to get them for free on the Internet. Information may want to be free, as the Web axiom suggests, but sending correspondents to Baghdad and Kabul and everywhere in between costs money. Information may want to be free, but knowledge and reporting and insight are expensive-and valuable.
机译:宪法的制定者保护了新闻自由,但他们并不意味着新闻界应该自由,因为没有人应该为此付出代价。实际上,他们认为,民主国家没有信息自由流通的成本太高了,无法支付。托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson)写道:“如果一个国家期望在文明状态下成为一个无知和自由的国家,那么它期望的是永远不会过去的一切。”如今,媒体行业的中心话题是如何保存和提供高质量的新闻报道,以及消费者和读者希望在Internet上免费获得它们时进行深度报告。正如网络公理所暗示的那样,信息可能希望是免费的,但是将记者派往巴格达和喀布尔以及之间的任何地方都要花钱。信息可能希望是免费的,但是知识,报告和见解是昂贵且有价值的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Time》 |2009年第6期|2|共1页
  • 作者

    Richard Stengel;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:40:19

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号