首页> 外文期刊>Time >Deliverance or Disaster?Four former solicitors general weigh in on Roberts' ruling
【24h】

Deliverance or Disaster?Four former solicitors general weigh in on Roberts' ruling

机译:拯救还是灾难?四位前律师对罗伯茨的裁决大加赞赏

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Supreme Court'S Decision Abounds with legal and political ironies. Foremost, and central to the result, is the majority's conclusion that the individual mandate is a legitimate exercise of Congress's power to tax. During the legislative debate, the President and his allies were adamant that the mandate was absolutely not a tax. Had they marketed this provision as a tax, the bill would surely not have passed. So the Supreme Court saved the signature legislative achievement of the Obama Administration precisely because it was not what the Administration said it was.
机译:最高法院的判决充满了法律和政治讽刺。多数意见得出结论,即个人授权是对国会征税权的合法行使,这是最重要的结果。在立法辩论中,总统及其盟友坚持认为,任务授权绝对不是税。如果他们将此规定作为一种税收推销,该法案肯定不会通过。因此,最高法院保留了奥巴马政府具有代表性的立法成就,正是因为这并非奥巴马政府所说的那样。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Time》 |2012年第3期|p.42-4345|共3页
  • 作者

    NEALKATYAL;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:35:22

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号