首页> 外文期刊>Third Text >Antinomies of Autonomism: On Art, Instrumentality and Radical Struggle
【24h】

Antinomies of Autonomism: On Art, Instrumentality and Radical Struggle

机译:自治的对立面:论艺术,工具和激进斗争

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Autonomist theory is arguably the most prominent orientation in contemporary social movements aiming beyond capitalism. However, certain tendencies within this stream of radical theory suffer from insuperable antinomies, particularly with regard to its operative conceptions of power, the state and anti-capitalist agency. Critical clarity concerning theoretical responses to practical impasses is a precondition for a collective passage beyond globalised class society. Reflection on the possible emancipatory roles of art makes sense only within a global historical analysis. This article traces autonomism from splits within the anti-Stalinist radical left after 1945, in the work of Cornelius Castoriadis and Guy Debord, to one of its most influential versions today, that of John Holloway. Holloway's Zapatista-inspired and Adorno-inflected notion of 'non-instrumental revolution' is analysed and assessed.
机译:自治理论可以说是超越资本主义的当代社会运动中最突出的方向。但是,这种激进理论流中的某些趋势遭受了无法克服的矛盾,特别是在其权力,国家和反资本主义机构的运作概念方面。关于对实际僵局的理论回应的批判性清晰度是超越全球化阶级社会的集体通过的前提。对艺术可能的解放作用的反思只有在全球历史分析中才有意义。本文从1945年后在Cornelius Castoriadis和Guy Debord的著作中所留下的反斯大林派激进分子内部的分裂,追溯到今天最有影响力的版本,即John Holloway的自治。分析并评估了Holloway的Zapatista启发和Adorno启发的“非工具革命”概念。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号