首页> 外文期刊>Thin Solid Films >Numerical analysis of the carrier behavior of organic light-emitting diode: comparing a hopping conduction model with a SCLC model
【24h】

Numerical analysis of the carrier behavior of organic light-emitting diode: comparing a hopping conduction model with a SCLC model

机译:有机发光二极管载流子行为的数值分析:比较跳跃传导模型和SCLC模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To clarify conduction mechanisms of organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), transient behavior of carriers and exciton distributions and field distortion in OLED are calculated using an one-dimensional discontinuous conduction model proposed in our previous paper. This study compares our hopping model with a bilayer-type of space charge limited current (SCLC) model. When applied voltage (V_a) was so high that luminescence exceeded 1000 cdm~(-2), calculated current density by the SCLC model was two orders of magnitude higher than experimental values; the internal electric field was discontinuous at the TPD/Alq_3 interface. Therefore, charge carrier density due to field discontinuity was approximately 1 X 10~(16) m~(-2). Density is so high that more than 1% of molecules take charge carriers in an interface layer. Voltage dependence of current density by the SCLC model differed with the experimental one at all voltages. Values of current density by the hopping model, which was fitted to an experimental value at V_a= 10 V, agreed with the experimental one for all applied fields. Luminance-voltage characteristics by the hopping model also agreed with experimental values. However, very large field distortion through the Alq3 layer from the TPD/Alq3 interface to the electrode existed by the SCLC model; this phenomenon did not exist in the hopping model. We concluded that electrical conduction in OLEDs could not be explained by the SCLC model.
机译:为了阐明有机发光二极管(OLED)的传导机理,使用我们先前论文中提出的一维不连续传导模型来计算OLED的载流子瞬态行为和激子分布以及场畸变。这项研究将我们的跳跃模型与双层型空间电荷限制电流(SCLC)模型进行了比较。当施加电压(V_a)太高以致发光超过1000 cdm〜(-2)时,SCLC模型计算出的电流密度比实验值高两个数量级。 TPD / Alq_3接口处的内部电场不连续。因此,由于场不连续而引起的载流子密度约为1×10 10(16)m 2(-2)。密度是如此之高,以至于超过1%的分子在界面层中带走了载流子。在所有电压下,SCLC模型对电流密度的电压依赖性均与实验值不同。跳变模型的电流密度值与V_a = 10 V的实验值拟合,与所有应用领域的实验值一致。跳跃模型的发光电压特性也与实验值一致。然而,SCLC模型存在从TPD / Alq3界面到Alq3层穿过Alq3层的非常大的场畸变。跳变模型中不存在这种现象。我们得出的结论是,SCLC模型无法解释OLED中的导电性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号