首页> 外文期刊>Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science >Analytic Cognitive Task Allocation: a decision model for cognitive task allocation
【24h】

Analytic Cognitive Task Allocation: a decision model for cognitive task allocation

机译:分析性认知任务分配:认知任务分配的决策模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper introduces Analytic Cognitive Task Allocation (Analytic CTA) as a decision model for cognitive task allocation. Analytic CTA can support system designers systematically analyse alternative allocation choices, evaluate them through criterion-based quantitative judgements and integrate partial judgements towards a final allocation decision. Analytic CTA was applied in the design of cognitive task allocation by testing three hypotheses. The hypotheses postulated that Analytic CTA can effectively support system designers in three ways: (a) in the identification of task requirements; (b) in the definition of design trade-offs between human allocation and automation; and (c) in the derivation of the allocation decision. Two groups of system designers allocated cognitive functions from three task scenarios in production planning and control. The experimental group, which was supported by the decision model, made allocation decisions which expressed weak preference for either human allocation or automation, consistent with the experimental tasks which had been selected as to elicit weak preferences. The control group relied on the early selection of an automation technology as the means of structuring the design problem. This involved reducing the task to a version suitable for automation, introduced a pro-automation bias and resulted in allocation decisions expressing strong preference for automation. These results were found in support of the experimental hypotheses.
机译:本文介绍了分析性认知任务分配(Analytic CTA)作为认知任务分配的决策模型。解析CTA可以支持系统设计人员系统地分析替代分配选择,通过基于标准的定量判断对它们进行评估,并将部分判断整合到最终分配决策中。通过测试三个假设,将分析型CTA应用于认知任务分配的设计中。假设假设分析CTA可以通过三种方式有效地支持系统设计人员:(a)确定任务需求; (b)在人员分配和自动化之间进行设计权衡的定义中; (c)在分配决定的推导中。两组系统设计人员从生产计划和控制中的三个任务场景分配了认知功能。在决策模型的支持下,实验小组做出了分配决策,表示对人为分配或自动化的偏好较弱,这与为激​​发弱偏好而选择的实验任务是一致的。控制组依靠尽早选择自动化技术来解决设计问题。这涉及将任务简化为适合自动化的版本,引入了自动化偏见,并导致分配决策表达了对自动化的强烈偏好。发现这些结果支持实验假设。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science》 |2008年第2期|p.155-185|共31页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Production and Management Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Main Library Building, Kimmeria, GR-67 100 Xanthi, Greece;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 O-023;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号