...
首页> 外文期刊>The Visual Computer >Comparison of three bounding regions with cubic convergence to planar freeform curves
【24h】

Comparison of three bounding regions with cubic convergence to planar freeform curves

机译:三次收敛到平面自由曲线的三个边界区域的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We compare the relative performance of bounding regions generated by three different curve-bounding methods with cubic convergence to planar freeform curves: spiral fat arcs (SFA) (Barton and Elber in Graph Models 73(2): 50-57, 2011), bilens (Kumosenko in Comput Aided Geom Des 30(3): 310-330, 2013), and bounding circular arcs (BCA) (Meek and Walton in J Comput Appl Math 59(2): 221231, 1995). For quantitative comparison, we consider three different criteria: geometric complexity (the number of circular arcs and line segments), construction time, and numerical stability. The BCA construction after one-step refinement (producing four circular arcs) is almost comparable to the other two methods in geometric complexity: the SFA with two circular arcs and two line segments, and the bilens with four circular arcs. In other comparison criteria, the BCA approach is more efficient and stable than the other two methods in producing a hierarchy of bounding regions that approximate a family of freeform planar curves within a given error bound.
机译:我们比较了三种不同的具有三次收敛性的曲线边界定界方法生成的边界区域相对于平面自由形式曲线的相对性能:螺旋脂肪弧(SFA)(Barton和Elber in Graph Models 73(2):50-57,2011),bilens (Kumosenko在Comput Aided Geom Des 30(3):310-330,2013)和定界圆弧(BCA)中(Meek和Walton在J Comput Appl Math 59(2):221231,1995)。为了进行定量比较,我们考虑了三个不同的标准:几何复杂度(圆弧和线段的数量),施工时间和数值稳定性。一步精炼(产生四个圆弧)后的BCA构造在几何复杂度上几乎可以与其他两种方法相媲美:具有两个圆弧和两个线段的SFA,以及具有四个圆弧的bilens。在其他比较标准中,BCA方法比其他两种方法更有效,更稳定,可在给定误差范围内生成近似一系列自由形式平面曲线的边界区域层次。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号