首页> 外文期刊>The Structural Engineer >Engineer's Guide to PI Claims Part 8: Litigation risk
【24h】

Engineer's Guide to PI Claims Part 8: Litigation risk

机译:PI索赔工程师指南第8部分:诉讼风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Proceeding to trial is generally unattractive for claimants and defendant engineers alike (although some jurisdictions are more claimant-friendly than others). There have been some positive developments for defendants in recent years, including a change in the law in England and Wales which makes it impossible for claimants' solicitors to charge heavily inflated fees in the event of success (which, in turn, would be recovered from the losing party). Previously, the effect of those arrangements in a "no win, no fee" culture had been that claimants were able to run their cases all the way to trial with disproportionately low risks as regards their own legal costs. In fairness, there can ultimately be very genuine reasons why the parties have not managed to conclude matters between themselves and why, therefore, a full-blown trial is the only remaining route available to them. The bottom line, as this article seeks to illustrate, is simply that if they do go down that route, then they should be prepared for all possible outcomes.
机译:一般而言,对原告和被告工程师来说,进行审判都没有吸引力(尽管某些司法管辖区比其他司法管辖区更为友好)。近年来,被告有一些积极的发展,包括英格兰和威尔士法律的变化,这使得原告的律师不可能在成功的情况下收取高额的虚假费用(反过来,这笔费用会从败诉方)。以前,这些安排在“不赢不赔”的文化中产生的影响是,索赔人能够一路将自己的案件进行审判,而就其自身的法律费用而言,风险却极低。公平地讲,最终可能有非常真实的原因,为什么当事方未能设法解决彼此之间的问题,以及为什么进行全面的审判是他们唯一可用的剩余途径。正如本文试图说明的,最重要的是,如果他们确实走了那条路,那么就应该为所有可能的结果做好准备。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Structural Engineer》 |2016年第9期|40-41|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:18:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号