首页> 外文期刊>The Structural Engineer >Developments in structural fire protection design - a US perspective
【24h】

Developments in structural fire protection design - a US perspective

机译:美国结构性消防设计的发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The next edition of the ASCE/SEI 7 standard commences a new and groundbreaking industry-consensus standard of care for structural fire protection in the USA, and other adopting Jurisdictions. The default option is termed standard fire resistance design, and is based on a long-standing empirical indexing system that excludes consideration of realistic thermal demands and structural system response.The only permitted alternative to standard fire resistance design is structural fire engineering (SFE), as constituted in the new Appendix E. SFE explicitly evaluates the demand and capacity of structural systems under fire loading in a simitar manner as other design loads are treated in structural engineering practice.Due to common misconceptions and lack of industry guidance, designers often erroneously intermingle these two approaches in order to justify structural fire protection variances. To combat this poor practice, recent industry efforts in the USA have focused on formally bifurcating these two design options, and providing specific requirements for the SFE approach.
机译:ASCE / SEI 7标准的下一版开始了一项新的,具有开创性的业界共识性标准,涉及美国的结构防火和其他采用的辖区。默认选项称为标准耐火设计,它基于长期存在的经验索引系统,不考虑实际的热需求和结构系统响应。标准耐火设计(SFE)唯一允许使用的替代标准耐火设计,由于新的误解和缺乏行业指导,设计人员经常错误地将其混合在一起,就像在新的附录E中构成的那样.SFE以类似的方式显着评估结构系统在火荷载下的需求和容量,因为其他设计荷载在结构工程实践中得到处理。这两种方法是为了证明结构性防火差异的合理性。为了克服这种不良做法,美国最近的行业努力集中在将这两种设计方案正式分叉,并为SFE方法提供了特定要求。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Structural Engineer》 |2018年第1期|25-29|共5页
  • 作者

    Kevin J. LaMalva;

  • 作者单位

    Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc., Boston, USA,ASCE/SEI Fire Protection Committee;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:18:47

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号