首页> 外文期刊>The police journal >Why policing the risk society became a footnote in American police studies: A missed opportunity to move police theorizing forward
【24h】

Why policing the risk society became a footnote in American police studies: A missed opportunity to move police theorizing forward

机译:为什么警务风险社会成为美国警察研究的脚注:一个错过的机会向前移动警察理论化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Written in 1997, Ericson and Haggerty’s book Policing the Risk Society (PRS) should have had profound effects on police theorizing and research in the United States. In this article, we attempt to explain why this book failed to gain traction within the American policing literature. We argue that PRS was ignored for three reasons: (1) incommensurable theoretical frameworks, (2) timing and aim of the book’s publication, and (3) the intrusiveness of deductive surveillance technologies in the policing of identities. We conclude by discussing how Ericson and Haggerty’s theorizing should be revisited in the light of recent developments in policing.
机译:撰写于1997年,埃里斯顿和哈格涅利的书籍警务风险社会(PRS)应该对美国警察理论化和研究产生深远的影响。 在本文中,我们试图解释为什么本书未能在美国警务文献中获得牵引力。 我们认为PRS被忽略了三个原因:(1)预定的理论框架,(2)书出版物的时间和目标,以及(3)在监管身份中的演绎监督技术的侵入性。 我们通过讨论埃里斯顿和哈吉特地的理论,鉴于最近的警务发展,讨论如何重新审视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号