首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Psychology >Adult Attachment Styles and Psychological Disease: Examining the Mediating Role of Personality Traits
【24h】

Adult Attachment Styles and Psychological Disease: Examining the Mediating Role of Personality Traits

机译:成人依恋风格与心理疾病:研究人格特质的中介作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of the present study was to examine differences in anxiety and depression related to differences in attachment models of the self and of others and whether personality traits mediate this relationship. The authors assessed attachment styles, anxiety, depression, and personality traits among 274 adult volunteers. Participants were classified into 4 attachment groups (secure, preoccupied, fearful, and dismissing-avoidant) according to K. Bartholomew's (1990) model. The present authors found significant differences among attachment groups on anxiety and depressive symptoms with attachment styles involving a negative self-model showing higher scores than attachment styles characterized by a positive self-model. The authors also found that differences between attachment styles in anxiety and depression remained significant when personality factors related to attachment prototypes were entered as covariates. Results indicate that secure attachment in adults was associated with better mental health, while insecure attachment styles characterized by negative thinking about the self were associated with higher depression and anxiety scores. Our findings seem to evidence that attachment and personality are only partly overlapping and that attachment cannot be considered as redundant with personality in the explanation of psychological disease. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:本研究的目的是研究与自我和他人依恋模型差异有关的焦虑和抑郁差异,以及人格特质是否介导这种关系。作者评估了274名成人志愿者的依恋风格,焦虑,抑郁和人格特质。根据K. Bartholomew(1990)的模型,参与者分为4个依恋组(安全的,专心的,恐惧的和回避的)。本作者发现,在焦虑和抑郁症状的依恋人群之间存在显着差异,其中依恋风格涉及的负面自我模型的得分要高于以正自我模型为特征的依恋风格。作者还发现,当将与依恋原型相关的人格因素作为协变量输入时,焦虑和抑郁的依恋风格之间的差异仍然很明显。结果表明,成年人的安全依恋与更好的心理健康有关,而对自我的负面思考所表征的不安全依恋则与较高的抑郁和焦虑评分有关。我们的发现似乎证明依恋和人格只是部分重叠,在解释心理疾病时不能认为依恋与人格无关。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Journal of Psychology》 |2010年第6期|p.523-534|共12页
  • 作者单位

    PAOLA SURCINELLINICOLINO ROSSIORNELLA MONTEBAROCCIBRUNO BALDAROUniversity of BolognaAddress correspondence to Paola Surcinelli, Department of Psychology, Viale Berti Pichat 5, 40127 Bologna, Italy, paola.surcinelli3@unibo.it (e-mail).AUTHOR NOTESPaola Surcinelli is research assistant professor of clinical psychology at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Bologna. Nicolino Rossi is full professor of clinical psychology at the Faculty of Medicine,University of Bologna. Ornella Montebarocci is research assistant professor of clinical psychology at the Faculty of Psychology,University of Bologna. Bruno Baldaro is full professor of clinical psychology at the Faculty of Psychology, University of Bologna.,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:18:41

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号