首页> 外文期刊>Paedagogica Historica >Artist as educator? Assessing the pedagogic role of folly in the early work of the Anglo‐Swiss artist Henry Fuseli (1741-1825)
【24h】

Artist as educator? Assessing the pedagogic role of folly in the early work of the Anglo‐Swiss artist Henry Fuseli (1741-1825)

机译:艺术家是教育家吗?评估愚蠢在盎格鲁·瑞士艺术家亨利·富塞利(Henry Fuseli)(1741-1825)早期作品中的教学作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This article examines a group of five ink, pen and wash drawings produced by the Anglo‐Swiss artist Henry Fuseli in the mid‐eighteenth century in Zurich. The drawings were produced for a Narrenbuch (Book of Fools) uniting visual images of folly with humorous slogans. The drawings are significant in that they imitate sixteenth‐century print culture and pedagogic literary genres based around the figure of the fool by humanist writers such as Sebastian Brant and Erasmus. The article argues that Fuseli’s conception of the Narrenbuch was a criticism of the ascetic methods of teaching employed at the Carolinum Collegium where he was training to become a Reformist Minister before he later became a well‐known artist in Britain. Furthermore, it argues that the Narrenbuch was also supposed to function as a type of male conduct book, thereby revealing the significant contribution Fuseli’s early works made to visual modes of instruction. By showing the extent to which Fuseli’s early drawings borrow from historical precedents and attitudes of Zurich intellectuals, the artist’s role as pedagogue is considered. By using Fuseli as a case study, the article suggests that artists often do more than “just” produce works of a didactic nature; rather their working methods, formalistic concerns and intellectual environment can all contribute to the potential pedagogic implications of their works.View full textDownload full textKeywordsartist as educator, Humanism, folly, Reformism, Carnival, Zurich, educational reform, (male) conduct book, subjective learning, text and imageRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2010.510477
机译:本文研究了十八个世纪十八世纪中叶在苏黎世由盎格鲁瑞士艺术家亨利·福塞利(Henry Fuseli)制作的一组五幅水墨,钢笔和水墨画。这些图画是为将愚人的视觉图像与幽默的口号相结合的《纳伦布奇》(《愚人之书》)制作的。这些绘画很重要,因为它们模仿了塞巴斯蒂安·布兰特(Sebastian Brant)和伊拉斯姆斯(Erasmus)等人文主义作家的愚人形象,模仿了16世纪的印刷文化和教学文学体裁。文章认为,Fuseli对纳伦布赫(Narrenbuch)的概念是对卡罗林纳姆学院(Carolinum Collegium)所采用的禁欲主义教学方法的批评,在他后来成为英国著名艺术家之前,他正在接受培训,成为改革派部长。此外,它认为纳伦布赫书也应该被当作一种男性行为书来发挥作用,从而揭示了富塞利早期的作品对视觉教学模式的重大贡献。通过显示Fuseli早期绘画在多大程度上借鉴了苏黎世知识分子的历史先例和态度,可以考虑该艺术家作为教育家的角色。通过使用Fuseli作为案例研究,文章建议艺术家所做的不仅仅是“仅仅”制作具有说教性的作品。相反,他们的工作方法,形式主义的关注和知识环境都可能对他们的作品产生潜在的教学影响。查看全文下载全文关键词艺术家作为教育家,人文主义,愚蠢,改良主义,狂欢节,苏黎世,教育改革,(男性)行为书,主观学习,文本和图像相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布日期:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b “};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00309230.2010.510477

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号