首页> 外文期刊>The environmentalist >Expertise processes in risk assessment and management: How to improve their governance and their conduct?
【24h】

Expertise processes in risk assessment and management: How to improve their governance and their conduct?

机译:风险评估和管理方面的专业知识流程:如何改善其治理和行为?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Major accidents and disasters, such as Fukushima in Japan (2011) and Aquila in Italy (2009), have significantly changed the conditions of public vigilance and their trust in so-called experts. They have also consequently questioned the legal liability of experts and have remobilized the scientific community in the way that the expertise process is conducted, governed and challenged. More robust, sound and reliable expertise processes are needed, and more transparency and accountability are asked for by the public. At the same time, the frontiers between expertise and decision processes must continually be reevaluated and subjected to possible public audits and scrutiny.
机译:日本的福岛(2011)和意大利的阿奎拉(2009)等重大事故和灾难已经大大改变了公众保持警惕的条件以及对所谓专家的信任。因此,他们还质疑专家的法律责任,并以进行,管理和挑战专业知识的方式动员了科学界。需要更强大,健全和可靠的专业知识流程,并且公众要求提高透明度和问责制。同时,必须不断地重新评估专业知识和决策流程之间的边界,并进行可能的公共审计和审查。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The environmentalist》 |2014年第2期|181-182|共2页
  • 作者

    Myriam Merad;

  • 作者单位

    INERIS, Paris, France;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号