首页> 外文期刊>The Engineer >IN YOUR OPINION
【24h】

IN YOUR OPINION

机译:依你的意见

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Our poll on this emotive topic attracted responses from 2500 individuals with 47% voting for the plan to be scrapped and 53% believing it should be given the go ahead. The poll also attracted a high number of comments, the majority from engineers spelling out the importance of coking coal for steel production. I worked in the steel industry for many years and fully understand that this is coking coal used to make coke that is, in turn, used to make Iron in a blast furnace. There is no economic alternative method. Perhaps people who voted yes might like to close the UK steel industry altogether. Then, the steel will be made in China, the C02 will still go up the chimney and thousands of British jobs go down the pan! Good thinking. There are alternative sources of carbon for steelmaking now, and likely to be more in the future. The UK should fund research into these and generate licence income to the IP from steelmakers around the world. Even if coke is required in the short term and has to be imported, it is better to get it from an existing mine rather than set up a new one which needs many years to pay back the return on investment, so locks UK steelmakers into old technology.
机译:我们对此情绪主题的民意调查吸引了2500名个人的回应,投票47%的投票,该计划被报废,53​​%相信它应该赋予前进。民意调查也吸引了大量评论,从工程师阐明了炼焦煤生产钢铁生产的重要性。我在钢铁行业工作了多年,充分了解这是焦煤,用于制造焦炭,又用于制作高炉中的铁。没有经济替代方法。也许投票是的人们可能希望完全关闭英国钢铁行业。然后,钢铁将在中国制作,C02仍将上升烟囱和成千上万的英国工作走了!好想法。现在有钢铁制造有替代的碳源,并且未来可能更多。英国应该将研究资助这些研究,并为世界各地的钢铁制造商提供许可收入。即使在短期内需要焦炭并且必须进口,最好从现有的矿井那里而不是建立一个需要多年的新人来偿还投资回报,所以将英国钢铁制造商锁定成旧技术。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The Engineer》 |2021年第7926期|21-21|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号