首页> 外文期刊>The ENDS report >Proposals For Mass Burn Incineration Pick Up Pace
【24h】

Proposals For Mass Burn Incineration Pick Up Pace

机译:大规模燃烧焚化的建议加快步伐

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The incineration boom is continuing. Three plants with a combined capacity of 656,000 tonnes per year have been awarded planning permission during the past six months. But Surrey's attempts to build a plant in Capel are in doubt again.rnThe fates of two incinerators that have long been stuck in the planning system were determined in recent weeks. Most notably, a controversial 110,000 tonnes per year capacity plant in Capel, Surrey, looks unlikely to go ahead following a High Court hearing.rnSurrey County Council awarded a Sita-subsidiary, Surrey Waste Management, consent for the plant last December. But Capel Parish Council challenged the consent. At a two-day hearing in January, Mr Justice Collins said he had ruled in favour of the parish council on at least one of the grounds of its appeal. These included allegations that Surrey had failed to properly assess Capel's suitability for incineration compared with three other sites. The parish council also said Surrey had not taken account of the proximity principle in its decision. Capel is near the county's border.rnThe text of Mr Justice Collins'judgment explaining the reasoning for his decision is expected at the end of February.rnThe decision is the latest twist in a long-running battle between Surrey County Council and local campaigners over its attempts to build an incinerator in the county. Applications for incinerators in Redhill and Guildford were rejected in 2001. Initial plans for a facility in Capel were rejected by a judicial review in 2002 (ENDS Report 335, PP 53-54).
机译:焚烧热潮仍在继续。在过去的六个月中,三个年产能合计为656,000吨的工厂已获得规划许可。但是萨里在卡佩尔(Capel)建厂的尝试再次受到质疑。最近几周确定了两个长期陷入计划体系中的焚化炉的命运。最值得注意的是,在高等法院听证会之后,萨里卡佩尔一家有争议的年产能11万吨的工厂似乎不太可能继续进行.rn萨里县议会于去年12月授予了Sita子公司萨里废物管理的同意。但是,卡佩尔教区议会对同意表示质疑。在1月份举行的为期两天的听证会上,柯林斯法官表示,他至少以其上诉理由之一,裁定支持教区理事会。这些指控包括与其他三个地点相比,萨里未能正确评估卡佩尔是否适合焚烧的指控。教区议会还表示,萨里在决定中未考虑邻近原则。卡佩尔(Capel)在县境附近。rn柯林斯大法官的判决书解释了作出这一决定的理由,预计将于2月底出台。试图在县里建造一个焚化炉。 Redhill和Guildford的焚化炉申请在2001年被拒绝。Capel设施的最初计划在2002年被司法审查拒绝(ENDS报告335,PP 53-54)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The ENDS report》 |2009年第409期|17-18|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号