首页> 外文期刊>The Computer journal >Philosophical and Logic-Based Argumentation-Driven Reasoning Approaches and their Realization on the WWW: A Survey
【24h】

Philosophical and Logic-Based Argumentation-Driven Reasoning Approaches and their Realization on the WWW: A Survey

机译:基于哲学和逻辑的论证驱动推理方法及其在WWW上的实现:一项调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Argumentation is the practice of systematic conscious reasoning involving the construction and evaluation of arguments to justify or support a particular conclusion. This article discusses, compares, contrasts and categorizes existing argumentation-based frameworks and applications as either philosophical or logic-based, and provides critical analysis that emphasizes the structure of arguments and the interactions between them. This review compares and contrasts the frameworks and applications of argumentation-based approaches on Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and subsequently highlights the importance and challenges of attaining monological argumentation on the Semantic Web.
机译:论证是系统的有意识推理的实践,涉及构造和评估论证以证明或支持特定结论的实践。本文讨论,比较,对比和分类现有的基于论证的框架和应用程序,无论是哲学的还是基于逻辑的,并提供批判性分析,以强调论证的结构及其之间的相互作用。本文对Web 2.0和语义Web上基于论证的方法的框架和应用进行了比较和对比,随后强调了在语义Web上实现一元论证的重要性和挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号