首页> 外文期刊>The APPEA Journal >RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH EXTENDED LEAK-OFF TESTS FOR IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENTS IN AUSTRALIA
【24h】

RECENT EXPERIENCE WITH EXTENDED LEAK-OFF TESTS FOR IN-SITU STRESS MEASUREMENTS IN AUSTRALIA

机译:在澳大利亚进行现场应力测量的扩展泄漏测试的最新经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The historical and theoretical backgrounds of standard and extended leak-off tests with respect to in-situ stress measurement are discussed and compared with hydraulic fracture stress measurement as practised in other industries. The relative advantages of extended leak-off tests compared with standard tests in this context are discussed and a case made for the extended test procedure. The diagnostics of pressure records obtained from extended leak-off tests are discussed in light of extensive experience obtained from hydraulic fracture stress measurement, with reference to a number of extended leak-off tests conducted in Australia. A conclusion is reached that extended leak-off tests can potentially provide data of quality comparable with that obtained from ideal hydraulic fracture stress measurement, allowing resolution of the in-situ stress field with reasonable reliability in many cases. The results of some Australian extended leak-off tests are discussed and contrasted with corresponding data obtained from standard leak-off tests. A trend is revealed from this data for extended leak-off tests to produce a lower estimate of the minimum stress magnitude than standard leak-off tests.
机译:讨论了就地应力测量进行标准和扩展泄漏测试的历史和理论背景,并将其与其他行业中的水力压裂应力测量进行了比较。在这种情况下,讨论了扩展泄漏测试与标准测试相比的相对优势,并为扩展测试程序提供了一个案例。根据从水力压裂应力测量获得的丰富经验,讨论了从扩展泄漏测试获得的压力记录的诊断方法,并参考了在澳大利亚进行的许多扩展泄漏测试。得出的结论是,扩展的泄漏测试可以潜在地提供与理想液压断裂应力测量所获得的质量相当的数据,从而在许多情况下能够以合理的可靠性解决原位应力场。讨论了一些澳大利亚扩展泄漏测试的结果,并将其与从标准泄漏测试获得的相应数据进行了对比。从该数据中可以看出,对于扩展的泄漏测试,与标准的泄漏测试相比,对最小应力大小的估计值更低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号