首页> 外文期刊>Telecommunications Policy >Closing information asymmetries: A scale agnostic approach for exploring equity implications of broadband provision
【24h】

Closing information asymmetries: A scale agnostic approach for exploring equity implications of broadband provision

机译:封闭信息不对称:探索宽带供应公平影响的规模不可知论方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A persistent challenge for telecommunications policy is the determination of broadband provision footprints in both space and time. In the United States, Form 477 data from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) provide a valuable snapshot of broadband provision at the block level, but there are often inconsistencies with the underlying data. These inconsistencies include overly-optimistic self-reports from providers, requirements to report broadband provision within inflexible census administrative units, and a modest temporal reporting schedule (biannual) with a significant, one year temporal lag. These uncertainties are often compounded by telecommunications providers refusing to disclose any information on service footprints, geographic expansion plans or the characteristics of populations served by broadband. This type of obfuscation drastically limits the ability of policy analysts to evaluate outcomes (both positive and negative) associated with service provision and the digital divide, more generally. With the recent entry of Google Fiber to several metropolitan markets in the United States, many of the broadband reporting and evaluation challenges have re-emerged. The purpose of this paper is to leverage basic data mining techniques, a scale agnostic geographic framework and exploratory spatial data analysis (ESDA), to uncover the geographic intricacies of Google Fiber (Fiber) service for both Provo, Utah and Austin, Texas and compare them to Form 477 reports. In addition, we use basic statistical approaches to explore issues of broadband access and equity, accounting for the differences in socio-economic and demographic status of the populace servedot served for both cities, as well as basic pricing within and between communities.
机译:电信政策的一项持续挑战是确定时空上宽带供应的足迹。在美国,来自联邦通信委员会(FCC)的表格477数据在块级别提供了宽带提供的宝贵快照,但通常与基础数据不一致。这些不一致之处包括提供商的自我报告过于乐观,要求在不灵活的人口普查管理部门内报告宽带供应,要求适度的时间报告时间表(每半年一次)以及巨大的一年时间滞后。电信提供商拒绝透露有关服务覆盖区,地理扩展计划或宽带服务的人口特征的任何信息,常常使这些不确定性更加复杂。这种类型的混淆极大地限制了政策分析人员评估与服务提供和数字鸿沟相关的结果(正面和负面)的能力(更一般而言)。随着Google Fiber最近进入美国的多个大城市市场,许多宽带报告和评估挑战再次出现。本文的目的是利用基本数据挖掘技术,与规模无关的地理框架和探索性空间数据分析(ESDA),揭示犹他州普罗沃和德克萨斯州奥斯汀的Google Fiber(Fiber)服务的地理复杂性,并进行比较他们以表格477报告。此外,我们使用基本的统计方法来探讨宽带接入和公平问题,并考虑两个城市/非城市居民所服务的民众的社会经济和人口状况差异,以及社区内部和社区之间的基本定价。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecommunications Policy》 |2019年第1期|50-66|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Arizona State Univ, Coll Publ Serv & Community Solut, Ctr Spatial Reasoning & Policy Analyt, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA;

    Arizona State Univ, Coll Publ Serv & Community Solut, Ctr Spatial Reasoning & Policy Analyt, Phoenix, AZ 85004 USA;

    Univ Sydney, Fac Architecture Design & Planning, Sydney, NSW, Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Google fiber; Digital divide; Spatial equity; Broadband; Urban governance; Form 477;

    机译:Google光纤;数字鸿沟;空间公平;宽带;城市治理;表格477;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 04:14:07

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号