...
首页> 外文期刊>Telecom A.M >DEMOCRATS, NET NEUTRALITY SUPPORTERS ANGRY AT DOJ 'RUBBER STAMP'
【24h】

DEMOCRATS, NET NEUTRALITY SUPPORTERS ANGRY AT DOJ 'RUBBER STAMP'

机译:民主党,净中立支持者激怒了司法部“橡皮图章”

获取原文

摘要

Net neutrality advocates condemned the Justice Dept.抯 decision to approve the proposed AT&T-BellSouth combination without conditions as failing consumers. 揥e are witnessing a wave of concentration in the telecommunications market that threatens to sweep away the free and open Internet,?said Free Press Policy Dir. Ben Scott. The merger shouldn't be allowed to proceed without 損ermanent, binding protections for net neutrality,?he said: 揟he new AT&T wants all the market power of its old monopoly without any consumer protections.?Prominent House Democrats also scolded DoJ for approving the deal without showing concern for a growing phone monopoly. The merger of 搕hese 2 Bell behemoths?shows how the Justice Dept. 揾as become the Executive branch's version of Rip Van Winkle -- it appears to be deep in the throes of a multi-year slumber,?said House Commerce Telecom Subcommittee Ranking Member Edward Markey (D-Mass.). nnDoJ can't 搃mpose conditions?like the FCC -- it can only find a merger legal or not with respect to its effect on competition, 2 Justice officials connected to the process told our affiliate Communications Daily. 揥e determined there was not a substantial harm to competition and there's no lawsuit we can bring,?one source said, pointing to the FCC's 搒lightly broader standard.?The other official added: 揜emember... this was the result of a 7-month investigation?involving many officials, many interviews and collecting data from both the merging and 3rd parties, all 搕aking into account [competitive] changes the industry has gone through.?/font>
机译:网络中立性的拥护者谴责了司法部的决定,该决定批准拟议中的AT&T-BellSouth合并,而没有任何条件使失败的消费者。 Free Press Policy Dir说:“目睹电信市场上的一波集中浪潮威胁要席卷自由开放的互联网。”本·斯科特。他说:“新的AT&T希望在没有任何消费者保护的情况下,保留其旧垄断的所有市场力量。”著名的众议院民主党人还指责司法部批准。这项交易并未引起人们对手机垄断的担忧。众议院商务电信小组委员会排名表示,“ heshes 2 Bell behemoths”的合并表明司法部“如何成为行政部门的Rip Van Winkle版本-似乎沉迷于多年的沉睡之中”。成员Edward Markey(D-Mass。)。 nnDoJ不能像FCC那样提出条件-就合并对竞争的影响而言,它只能发现合法合并与否,两位与该程序相关的司法官员告诉我们的分支机构《通讯日报》。一位消息人士指出,FCC认为“对竞争没有实质性损害,也没有诉讼可以提起。”另一位官员补充说:“各位……这是为期7个月的调查?涉及许多官员,许多采访以及从合并方和第三方收集数据,所有这些都考虑到了该行业经历的[竞争性]变化。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Telecom A.M 》 |2006年第197期| P.1-1| 共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号